![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]()
On a somewhat related topic
I have never understood the rational that a member of Congress HAS to maintain two residences. One in DC and one in their home state. Who says they have to? Many members of Congress CHOOSE to maintain two residences. Well that is their choice and as such I don't see any reason why the taxpayers need to foot the bill. When I was in the military I was moved to other states. Could I have charged the military double allowances because I NEEDED to maintain residences not only in my state of reference but also in my state of duty? But then who decides what the rules and perquisites are for Congress? Congress. Who provides oversight over Congress? Congress. Who controls the money spent for these perquisites? Congress Ya know, this congress gig is starting to sound like a pretty good racket. ![]()
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: At comms depth, obviously.
Posts: 1,476
Downloads: 7
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Always has been. They give themselves raises, for chrissakes...talk about conflict of interest!
![]()
__________________
![]() "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it." -Mark Twain |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]()
Legally, they can't give themselves a pay raise. Any pay raise passed would only apply to the following congress.
Practically, however, since there is a 90% + re-election rate in congress, they are, in effect, voting themselves a pay raise. Conflict of Interest? Legally no Practically yes
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|