SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-06-09, 11:28 AM   #1
UnderseaLcpl
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Storming the beaches!
Posts: 4,254
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zachstar
This is extremely good news and deserves every penny of money that can be thrown at it.
You worry me when you say things like that

I don't really understand why you don't think there will be any net positive energy though. If one of these can burn the waste from 10 to 15 light water reactors, as they claim, or even if it can only burn the waste from one, surely the additional nukes would provide a net gain?
__________________

I stole this sig from Task Force
UnderseaLcpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-09, 03:17 PM   #2
Zachstar
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 1,956
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderseaLcpl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zachstar
This is extremely good news and deserves every penny of money that can be thrown at it.
You worry me when you say things like that

I don't really understand why you don't think there will be any net positive energy though. If one of these can burn the waste from 10 to 15 light water reactors, as they claim, or even if it can only burn the waste from one, surely the additional nukes would provide a net gain?
LWRs are pretty good at getting the "good stuff" the sludge I hear has not all that much energy potential. And the idea is to burn this slow so you roast everything and not get left with a bunch of short lived super radioactive crap contaminating everything. Even with the fusion helping it would take years to burn that much material.
__________________

Zachstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-09, 07:53 PM   #3
SandyCaesar
Chief
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: HMS Thanatus
Posts: 325
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Actually, waste-burning power plants aren't even an old idea. Look up the Integral Fast Reactor program from the 1980s: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_Fast_Reactor

Closed-fuel system, high level of safety, proven record? I'd buy that. But apparently there are "proliferation" concerns, as it is technically a breeder reactor, and everybody knows that breeders are evil, nasty things whose sole purpose is to create weapons-grade.
__________________

Vanvikan, Feb. 2009: ordinary human, KIA, night 4



HMS Thanatus, May 2009: ??? human, KIA, night 7
SandyCaesar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-09, 08:17 PM   #4
UnderseaLcpl
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Storming the beaches!
Posts: 4,254
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SandyCaesar
Actually, waste-burning power plants aren't even an old idea. Look up the Integral Fast Reactor program from the 1980s: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_Fast_Reactor

Closed-fuel system, high level of safety, proven record? I'd buy that. But apparently there are "proliferation" concerns, as it is technically a breeder reactor, and everybody knows that breeders are evil, nasty things whose sole purpose is to create weapons-grade.
You are correct in asserting that fast-breeders have a lot of potential. Zachstar will disagree, though.
__________________

I stole this sig from Task Force
UnderseaLcpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-09, 10:45 PM   #5
Zachstar
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 1,956
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

I have no serious issue with breeders. But its one of the #1 talked about things in anti-nuc circles tho. I think we will see a fusion-fission hybrid long before we see too many of those.
__________________

Zachstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-09, 11:47 PM   #6
Onkel Neal
Born to Run Silent
 
Onkel Neal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Cougar Trap, Texas
Posts: 21,385
Downloads: 541
Uploads: 224


Default

Any progress on eliminating nuke waste efficiently is a good thing, it allows us to fully tap into nuclear energy tech.
__________________
SUBSIM - 26 Years on the Web
Onkel Neal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-09, 11:57 PM   #7
Zachstar
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 1,956
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neal Stevens
Any progress on eliminating nuke waste efficiently is a good thing, it allows us to fully tap into nuclear energy tech.
Indeed tho the cost of fission reactors will never drop because the idiocy never ends.

I LOVE the modern designs. HIGHLY efficient and HIGHLY safe. But the cost is just too much. Modern heat solar kicks its ass nine ways to Sunday.
__________________

Zachstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.