Chinese ship uses molotov cocktails to fight off Somali pirates

[bradclark1]

Originally Posted by August

I think a Marine infantry platoon put aboard each ship before it leaves port and then removed after it clears the danger area would be an effective deterrent. I mean if a bunch of Chinese civilian sailors can fight them off with molotov cocktails fire hoses how difficult would it be for trained Marines?

It'd certainly be a lot cheaper to the ship owners than any convoy system.

A company like Blackwater or one of the others would work better. Saves on possible rightious problems.

[Dowly]

What a waste of alcohol...

Jack Sparrow's take on the issue:

[baggygreen]

Didn't the UN just give the go-ahead to land and air action against the pirates??

What are we waiting for

[PeriscopeDepth]

Using a convoy to deter pirates in small, fast craft with RPGs is like trying to take down that mosquito buzzing around with an assault rifle.

What are we waiting for

Who knows. Best case scenario they are waiting for a bunch of ships from nations who aren't present but really want to be when they lay the smack down so they can declare their navy part of the glorious, successful pirate cleansing operation. Worst case they are still arguing the finer points of the RoE. If they haven't figured that out yet, they probably never will.

But, methinks if governments really did think these guys were threats, they would be proactively killing them. Not sending a ship to the area and issuing a a press release.

PD

[Frame57]

Much cheaper to mount some .50 cal on the rails and possibly some RPG's.

[Task Force]

Originally Posted by Frame57

Much cheaper to mount some .50 cal on the rails and possibly some RPG's.

you got a point there. But what if someone uses these for the rong reasons. or a pirate group gets hold of the ship? the ship would be twice as dangerous.

[A Very Super Market]

The pirates already have AK-47s and RPGs.

Just dump the guns overboard if it becomes apparent that you're losing.

And the pirates don't want to use a slow, obvious cargo ship to attack other slow, obvious cargo ships.

[Task Force]

maby all ship crews should be trained how to do this for defense.:hmm: And if a ship is going though pirated waters then they should have military personnel on them.

Time to reinstate the convoy system?

The French operating out of Djibouti are already doing it .
But your ship has to be able to maintain the required speed .
You have to book 10 days in advance .
Only one convoy operates so its a case of waiting if you are going up the gulf but the convoy is coming down .
Only 2 civilian ships in the convoy are allowed armed military personel on board as there are only 2 military vessels escorting and it isn't a state of war .
Extra ships that are not booked on the convoy are allowed to tag along , but get no guarantee of protection or assistance .

However , the French are providing the service free of charge .

A company like Blackwater or one of the others would work better. Saves on possible rightious problems.

Unfortunately not .
Leaving aside the legal/insurance issues the fact remains that in the main the first the crew know about the attack is when the pirates have already boarded and either siezed control of the ship or taken hostages .
The recent incident in the Gulf of Aden where a shipping company had hired armed guards illustrates this well , the two British guards jumped overboard as the pirates had already taken control before they had noticed it happening and they were powerless in a hostage situation .
As for the possible "rightious" problems you only have to look at the Indian Navy sinking the pirates "mothership" last month .
It wasn't a "mothership" it was a newly captured fishing boat with all its crew on board , the pirates escaped in their speed boats and all the fishermen (except one who was left drifting for six days) were killed by the Indian frigate .
Slightly embarrasing on the "righteous" front eh ?

[bradclark1]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

The French operating out of Djibouti are already doing it .
But your ship has to be able to maintain the required speed .
You have to book 10 days in advance .
Only one convoy operates so its a case of waiting if you are going up the gulf but the convoy is coming down .
Only 2 civilian ships in the convoy are allowed armed military personel on board as there are only 2 military vessels escorting and it isn't a state of war .
Extra ships that are not booked on the convoy are allowed to tag along , but get no guarantee of protection or assistance .

However , the French are providing the service free of charge .

Unfortunately not .
Leaving aside the legal/insurance issues the fact remains that in the main the first the crew know about the attack is when the pirates have already boarded and either siezed control of the ship or taken hostages .
The recent incident in the Gulf of Aden where a shipping company had hired armed guards illustrates this well , the two British guards jumped overboard as the pirates had already taken control before they had noticed it happening and they were powerless in a hostage situation .
As for the possible "rightious" problems you only have to look at the Indian Navy sinking the pirates "mothership" last month .
It wasn't a "mothership" it was a newly captured fishing boat with all its crew on board , the pirates escaped in their speed boats and all the fishermen (except one who was left drifting for six days) were killed by the Indian frigate .
Slightly embarrasing on the "righteous" front eh ?

The obvious thing would be to have a force larger then two people. Kind of half arsed stupid. You have enough men for 360 degree observation while in the danger zone. Considering the security is there for security and not engaged in mothership attacking it's a none issue. Leave attacking to national navies.
I don't know what you mean by legal/insurance issues. I would assume insurance wouldn't like to pay out a ransom or loss of a ship and I would also assume that the pirates wouldn't sue for not being allowed to pirate a ship or file assult charges for getting shot.

[August]

Originally Posted by bradclark1

The obvious thing would be to have a force larger then two people. Kind of half arsed stupid. You have enough men for 360 degree observation while in the danger zone. Considering the security is there for security and not engaged in mothership attacking it's a none issue. Leave attacking to national navies.

Exactly. Well put Brad.

[subchaser12]

Originally Posted by bradclark1

A company like Blackwater or one of the others would work better. Saves on possible rightious problems.

Blackwater needs to be shut down. I wouldn't want those wahoos near me. I don't care if they are "former" special ops. They are former for a reason. I don't care if you were a Ranger 10 years ago, out of date and out of shape just means you are some has been retread out trying to make some coin.

Look at photos of the Blackwater people, most of them have beer bellies. Mercenaries are never the way to go.