![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Weps
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 374
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
In fact, I´m thinking in the HMS Onyx and her collision (back in 1982 - look at the "HMS Onyx pics wanted post") with a submerged rock while she was on a covert ops mission.
Could the collision be avoided with a active sonar switched on?
__________________
Ultima Ratio Regis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: 1300 feet on the crapper
Posts: 1,860
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Hmmmm? Well, you may want to post this in the DW section here. There are a couple of former Sonar techs who could answer this for certain. I was an A-ganger so my knowledge is limited with regards to sonar.
However, I do know that HF works best for navigational purposes like detecting Ice bergs, Mines and operating under the polar caps. A rock being submerged? Well I would think the rock would have to be part of a land mass because rocks generally do not float or have neutral bouyancy, so again I think either they did not have a fathometer or it was not turned on in order to avoid this situation. The signal bounced back from active sonar will be dependant upon signal strength, target distance and density and thermal condition etc.. so I cannot say yea or nay but someone here will I am sure. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 622
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
My Father's ship, HMCS Waskesiu (K330), sank U257 on 02/24/1944 ![]() running SHIII-1.4 with GWX2.1 and SHIV-1.5 with TMO/RSRDC/PE3.3 under MS Vista Home Premium 32-bit SP1 ACER AMD Athlon 64x2 4800+, 4GB DDR2 RAM, 400GB SATA HD Antec TruePower Trio 650watt PSU BFG GeForce 8800GT/OC 512MB VRAM, Samsung 216BW widescreen (1680x1050) LCD |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|