SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-08-08, 07:27 PM   #11
Sea Demon
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,552
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradclark1
[I feel sorry for anybody that has to put a political lean in all aspects of their life. One can't help put wonder if the "right" was GL you'd be fanatical
about it then too. Three political references in one global warming paragraph. You're something else.

blah, blah, blah....whine..whine...whine.....quibble...quibble ..quibble...


Congradulations! You actually posted a credible link.
There simply is no political context there. Other than to point out that most people who believe this nonsense quite often are Dem's. What's the matter...upset that it's the truth that it's largely lefties who wear the tin foil? I think it's quite relevant as we have two sides that are vying to run the country. Your warming proponent side, I believe, will take us down a path that would be detrimental, risky, and unecessary to a large extent. I don't want the political side that pushes faulty theories with fraudulent and costly "fixes" to get elected. As much as we can prevent that from happening, I like to point it out. And I will continue to do so. Get over it. I find it funny that you try to blur the lines of your own political slant.

And I also love your back peddling. All you've done on this thread and the Al Gore thread is pimp for the man-made warming theories and have done nothing but deny reality. You have been faced with questions you cannot answer, faulty data from your "sources" that you cannot answer for, and blatant hypocrisy from the proponents of your movement you have tried to excuse but cannot. You have not answered any of my previous questions, and have run away from every single thread topic once they get asked of you. But yet, you come back eventually with a seeming, yet feeble attempt to try and convince people of your fantasies, and people are now moving away from these theories. I even see that you are making a desperate yet anemic attempt to support it now. Nothing has changed, but your positions are getting harder and harder to explain and defend. And they will get more difficult in the future. Why? Because you have bought fallacious theories wholesale without any thinking or rationalizations on your part. You have basically given your thinking responsibilities over to a science academy with a nice sounding name. Their data is wrong, yet you unwaveringly continue to support their theories. There are many scientists from many credible organizations that are pointing out what I'm saying right here. But you shut your ears to them, and bury your head in quicksand because you want to believe in your movement. Where I come from that's plain stupid, and politically slanted. Now you are left to do nothing but back-peddle. Your bogus links have been lying to you. Perhaps you can get off your rump, look at the world around you, listen to all points of view, actually try and interpret the data, question the inconsistincies, and bad data, and dig yourself out of your hole.


BTW, I find this statement from you and your use of this emoticon just plain weird:

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradclark1
We are going through a heat wave this week here so global warming must be happening. Getting close to sixty.
A smiley face when trying to convince people of your disaster scenario???? Odd.

In the interest of reality, here's a news story of interest. Snow in Mexico? Can you say, natural temperature variation? How could this be?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080103/...U7TSwHe.ZvaA8F

And this. Despite increases in CO2 output overall, slightly cooler 2008. (note: I can do the smiley emoticon as it's good news for humanity)

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5...-wJ4OmHAYGbvPg

For your own consumption, yes I'm aware of what it says on paragraph #1. Please actually interpret what they're saying and how it relates to the premises of the man-made theories regarding CO2 emissions. This really isn't that hard.

Do you even know how much CO2 we emit compared to the total of greenhouse gases? Anyway, I'm enjoying your impotence on this subject matter. Many holes in man-made warming theories abound. And alot more people speaking out on behalf of common sense, reason, and good old fashion data analysis. But I will say your persistence here to prove this junk is quite ......well.....interesting.........

Last edited by Sea Demon; 01-08-08 at 08:01 PM.
Sea Demon is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.