![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#15 |
Cold War Boomer
![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Walla Walla
Posts: 2,837
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
This war is the end of war as modern man has fought war ...
Tanks and planes ... men and machines started this war that has now become a war of occupation. We bascically have made all of Iraq a DMZ ... All we have proved is that you can't win a war. if you are a poor country, without WMD's. This take over of Iraq and Afganistan may be the end of war as we know it. Now what do you think of first strike ... ? Better be a solid as a rock President on the way. I pray the next president to visit the war college every three months just to train himself on how to react to some anti-American country with WMD's threatening our way of life. I don't see the enemies of Israel using anything so destructive with Jerusalem being so Holy to their religion, but they have already used the threat of WMD's Israel has WMD's Syria has Iraq's WMD's (don't argue just accept it) Iran has WMD's Saudi Arabia just has some old F-15's and some AWAC's America has WMD's WMD's can ruin your whole day ... The generals are already looking at what this war cost ... I wish it were the men that made a difference, but it is the budget. We can't fight another war like this is the bottom line. WMD's are not only cheaper for poor countries without a big army, airforce, navy, but also for big rich in debt countries. It would be foolish to fight another war like this one ... America will have to adjust to the threat of WMD's from it's enemies like never before ... First strike vs a dragged out war that no one wants ... Which one makes sense?
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|