SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-13-21, 06:24 PM   #1
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,660
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default American wokeness versus French egalité

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-59584125


Quote:
"Will France end up going woke? The jury is still out," says Justin EH Smith, an American philosophy professor at Paris University.


"Personally I find it liberating to teach here. I don't have to mind my every word, like I did with American students. Here, there is still a presumption that universities are a place to learn, and the staff is not there to cushion the subject matter."


But Prof Smith says signs of "wokeism" are nonetheless appearing on campus.


He cites seeing for the first time graffiti in English targeting "terfs" - or trans-exclusionary radical feminists. The use of English was significant, he says, because it "trickles in via elite bicultural, bilinguistic nodes" such as can be found at the university.


However, the new American ideas face a big difficulty in France, he believes, "because one of the cornerstones of French Republicanism is a principle that has become anathema in the context of US-style wokeism - and that is colour-blindness".


France's answer to protecting minorities is "universalism" - the notion that everyone is the same and should be treated the same.


But so-called "woke" thinkers have a different set of values. They say race, colour, gender do matter, because people have different lived experiences depending on those factors, and so public policies need to differentiate between different groups - which is anathema to the French.

In the end, woke people, gender people, quota people, xyz activist people are all the same in this: they are selfish egoists who claim special priviliges for themselves, foudned nmot by achieeving, deserving, eanring or comeptence, skill, qualification, but by simple memeberhsip to the "correct" perr group supporting them.



Needless to say, I think thsi is wrign doing, and I cannot see how qualification and acheivement of any kind can be created this way.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.