French and British Sonar

[micky1up]

the whole point of the thread was about the capability of sonar and a typical secular answer from the us contingent was that nobodies sonar could match thiers i begged to differ with the 19 years tactical submarine xp that i have my reply was to the fact that if you consider everyone elses equipment inferior to yours it is a dangerous thing to do ( a spear is better than a rock but if the rock is used by and expert with years of experience it to can be deadly) and no matter what cash you have the quality of the people using the equipment with make the difference norman schwazkoff said" if the equipment had been reversed in the first gulf war the allies would still have won" i agree the quality of the iraqi army was at best meduim and worst vv poor and the quality gap between the russian sonars and the wests sonars may not be as large as many people think along with many other items and units pertaining to the submarine and naval world. if you think like that in comabt situations you get surprised and battles and armys dont like surprises neither do submarine captains thats why i would bet every naval commander on whatever unit would treat the enemy as if they were on par or better than themselves that way you can never underestimate their capability