![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 | |
Soaring
|
![]()
http://emotionresearcher.com/politic...mean-and-dumb/
Kind of a summary of some of the core arguments of the book by the author that I currently read. Also, this: http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com...ttle-feelings/ General, vague own doubts, and then Hoppe were main origins for my growing critical attitude towards democracy. It seems I now stumbled over another major name to add to that: Brennan. Like Hoppe, Brennan offers an ill-defended flank for counter attack, for criticism. Different to Hoppe, he admits that there are some weak sides in his alternative model, which he considers to be not complete therefore (whereas Hoppe seems to think he offered a complete and realistic alternative - on which I would disagree). But both men point at the same direction, and they do so for mutually supporting, complementary arguments and reasons. Their diagnosis and description on the hopelessly messed up status quo and the inner contradictions of the democratic concept, is very hard to fight against, I think they simply are very right there. On the alternatives they offer, more discussion and solution-finding is needed. Hoppe concludes that all existence of a state has to be denied and that there is no need for having a state in the first, no matter whether it is a democracy or a monarchy or whatever. Brennan seems to be less radically against having a state as a principal basis of human community, but seems to take the need for state as a basis. But maybe I have not yet read enough by him. Quote:
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. Last edited by Skybird; 04-24-17 at 06:35 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|