SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-12-06, 09:00 PM   #16
Heibges
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

That's right I'm sorry. I meant perpendicular course, bearing 0°, AoB 90°. You are using the MILS method also, which we were discussing above. Do you have a complete chart for this? I had one which I had scibbled in a notebook, which got thrown away before I could put it on the computer. I haven't gone on patrol in a while because I need to redo the chart before I do.

The one problem I have , and something that is very realistic and really hampered the uboat effort, is that in poor visibility I might not have 3:15 of visibility time. Also, being submerged, I am at the mercy of the convoy if they change course.

It's easy to see why the uboats were so much more successful on the surface than at PD.

I'm sure kalues did have extensive combat tables, similiar to what an artillery unit would have.
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface.

http://www.hackworth.com/
Heibges is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.