Japanese Ships Which Should be in SHIV

Wulfmann · 04-12-06, 01:33 PM

I agree on the Washington class as number one (sorry Uncle George((Served on the USS Missouri)).
Remember. What starts in 1944 (Iowas) is not in for 2 full years.
So after the W and NC I would want the South Dakota class and more US cruisers and carriers built than BBs.
There is a limit on what they will be able to do.

Important to note. With Rodney's turrets and South Dakotas super structure the Tennessee and California BBs were rebuilt using a similar super structure to SD. If the SD is made the devs would only need to make the hull to have those as later ships (are you taking notes here devs?)

Wulfmann

04-12-06, 01:33 PM	#11
Wulfmann Ace of the Deep Join Date: May 2005 Location: Florida Posts: 1,010 Downloads: 1 Uploads: 0	I agree on the Washington class as number one (sorry Uncle George((Served on the USS Missouri)). Remember. What starts in 1944 (Iowas) is not in for 2 full years. So after the W and NC I would want the South Dakota class and more US cruisers and carriers built than BBs. There is a limit on what they will be able to do. Important to note. With Rodney's turrets and South Dakotas super structure the Tennessee and California BBs were rebuilt using a similar super structure to SD. If the SD is made the devs would only need to make the hull to have those as later ships (are you taking notes here devs?) Wulfmann __________________ "The right to keep and bear arms should not be infringed upon, if only to prevent tyranny in government" Thomas Jefferson,; Constitutional debates