SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-15-06, 07:38 PM   #16
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

OK this is bugging me, use language properly.

"Structural faults" would refer to either A)Bad construction techniques and build quality. B)Flaws in the processes used to run whatever system.

You can't pick and choose.

Chernobyl, they cocked up. Ran an experiment that shouldn't have been run, the engineers in the reactor shouldn't have run it and I think they knew that.

What pisses me off about it all is that after Chernobyl western media lumped all the other reactors of that design together and call them unsafe. E.G. in Estonia I think there is a nuclear reactor that provides 80% of the contry's power. The EU wants it shut down (part of membership agreement) and the BBC went to pains to stress it was a Chernobyl type reactor.

Although I think Russia can still be a bit paranoid and this is from someone who has lived there and who is married to a Russian I do think the western media and the west in general like to find ways to make Russia look like the baddy. I think it is psychological inertia from the cold-war.
Sure after Chernobyl things were added to dumb ****s couldn't disable safety systems. Thing is the design wasn't flawed really.
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.