![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]()
Now that we've finished LWAMI 3.11 and I released my China single-player campaign, I'm hoping to go back to actually playing DW instead of just working on it.
But rather than getting into duels again, I was thinking about making a Force-on-Force campaign, one which would hopefully be much simpler than the GDT experiment a few years back. So here is what I have in mind. Premise: Two opposing navies fight for resources in a relatively confined geographic location with lots of small islands; perhaps the Aegean. The navies will be composed of DW platforms: playable platforms, AI warships, aircraft, amphibs, merchants, etc. Each side is played by one or more players, in theory one per side is adequate, but obviously the more people that can join in the better the battles will be. The territory each side controls will earn resources/victory points for that side. The campaign can end at a set number of points or when one side runs out of ships or territory. The turns can be divided into Three phases. Phase 1: Ante up Each side declares what they're going to do with their units. The commands would essentially be "invade island X" or "protect island Y" or so forth. No detailed movement tracking is required, so a dedicated GM is not needed. Declarations can be done via email with password protected Word attachments. The password is revealed after emails are exchanged, so no one sees the other side's declaration before they have made their own. Phase 2: Battle Anytime two groups end up trying to fight in same spot, a DW mission is belted out and the fight is played. Phase 3: Resolution and Resources A side that successfully invades an island takes control of it. If both sides land, then the side with more troops will take control. There is room to add some complexity here with contested territory and casualties (e.g. control is achieved at 2-to-1 advantage, losing side takes casualties based on ratio of forces, reinforcements can be landed, evacuations can be so the troops can be used somewhere else). Territory that is controlled generates resources for the side that controls it. Those resources get stored on-site. On-site resources can be shipped out in commerce as part of the Phase 1 declaration. If this is successful (the merchies don't get sunk), the side will receive revenues from this. There may also be some fixed income as well (i.e. taxes from the motherland). So you have money to spend to train troops or purchase new platforms. (The purchase would actually take place in Phase 1 of the next turn). That's pretty much it. I see some details that need to be worked out with mission design, abstracted land combat, and figuring out the available units and their prices, but those issues don't seem insurmountable. Definitely easier than the GDT was. And the best part from my perspective is that this format doesn't need a dedicated GM because there is no need for any secret movements to be tracked; the players themselves can run it. Which means I can run it and be a player! So, would anyone want to do this? ![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|