![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#14 | |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]() Quote:
I think you are making some assumptions here. There was no blind faith here. At the time that the Titanic was designed, the worst accident that could endanger a ship like the Titanic was a mid ocean collision with another ship. In 1909 the White Star ship Republic was hit by the Florida. The Florida hit the Republic right at the seam between two watertight compartments. The Republic sank two days later. No one considered that a ship like the Titanic was unsinkable (what was the media) but naval engineers were convinced that a ship like the Titanic could not sink quickly. This was why the Titanic only had a limited number of life boats. The expected purpose was to ferry passengers to a rescuing ship and also use the life boats of the other ship. Life boats at that time were not designed to carry passengers adrift for weeks. This is why the Titanic was designed to stay afloat with any four compartments flooded. No one considered that more than 2-3 compartments could be flooded in any one accident. The Titanic was clearly not a perfect design, but it did represent the state of the art design for ship safety. A glancing blow buckling plates as what happened with the Titanic was not considered a realistic threat. Perhaps the designers could be criticized for not considering future accidents that had not occurred. But to say that the designers had blind faith in technology over nature is unjustified. The designers knew that the Titanic, like any ship, can sink. They designed the ship to survive any anticipated accident, and, in my opinion, did it well. It is tragic that the Titanic, through human errors, was involved in an accident that was not anticipated. But I think blaming the designers and builders is unjustified.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|