Monstrous

Platapus · 05-12-11, 05:57 PM

As always in cases like this, I wonder if there is not more to the story.

It just does not make sense. He saw an obstruction, had the power killed, wore protective shoes and removed the obstruction.

What safety rules did he violate?

What is the "approved" procedure that he "should" have followed?

PS: from the BBC sites, it appears that the violation was not confirming that the power was turned off. A safety violation. But enough of a violation to fire the person?

05-12-11, 05:57 PM	#7
Platapus Fleet Admiral Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 19,369 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 0	As always in cases like this, I wonder if there is not more to the story. It just does not make sense. He saw an obstruction, had the power killed, wore protective shoes and removed the obstruction. What safety rules did he violate? What is the "approved" procedure that he "should" have followed? PS: from the BBC sites, it appears that the violation was not confirming that the power was turned off. A safety violation. But enough of a violation to fire the person? __________________ abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.