![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#9 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In the mountains, now. On the edge of the sea before.
Posts: 933
Downloads: 47
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
This is actually a very useful thread, because, as far as I can see, there is little more than anecdotal claims on the subject of torpedo reliability.
I assume "dud" means a perfectly aimed torpedo, in other words, failure on the torp's part, not mine. If so, then 6% sounds right for magnetics in GWX, at least until 1941, when it seems to improve. And it is always premature detonation. However, I use magnetics only when the distance/sea state permits to avoid premature detonations (for example, in rough seas, I use mag only at 1000 meters or less). If I used them in all situations, the premature detonation rate would certainly be higher in 39-40. As you can see, I don't know (and don't want to know) whether GWX rolls the dice on a magnetic at launch or does so at intervals or there is a condition that set the premature detonation. With an impact shot, I have never, to my knowledge, had a dud. Or at least nothing that could not be plausibly ascribed to sea state (my depth is correct, but the bow rose just before impact, etc) or being "made" by the target.
__________________
"Well, now, that's true... the IXC is a bit of a chick magnet..but you really can't beat the VIIB for off-road fun." |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|