Turkey warns EU becoming 'Christian club'

Skybird · 01-30-11, 09:51 PM

"My points", as you ccall them, are not my points, but that of critics whose arguments I follow and just "quote": because they make sense to me, more sense than the official propaganda line at least, and because of the reputation and background of these critics.

It is not my personal conspiration theory, but worries and concerns of insiders knowing the matter and links much better than I will ever do. And in the end the words of a Roman Herzog, Valery Giscard-d'Estaing and Helmut Schmidt have much more weight to me than those of an Angela Merkel, Manuel Barosso, Claude Juncker or Nobody Rumpoy. And if even the two fathers of the Eu treateies, Giscard-d'Estaing and Schmidt, criticise the shapew the EU has gotten during the last 20 years, then this tells me something.

And Wulff, I think he jumps with a happy smile to snap the pralines Merkel is throwing to him when he did something the way she thinks he should. Blair was Bush's poodle, and Wulff is Merkel's. Gauck would have been the far better choice for the post, with far more moral integrity and authority. Wulff's submissive basic attitude is - ashaming.So much I rate all he did in office, as failings: that he made a Muslim close friend of a known Islamic and ultranationalistic Turk a minister in his old cabinet befor eleaving, his acting regarding the causa Sarrazin, his infantile christmas appearance on TV that was meant to be "innovative", and his latest stunt during the Auschwitz remembrance when he acted with masochistic submission and implied that generations of even not yet born Germans being responsible for what has happened 70 years ago.

Disgusting, naive, and spineless. Gauck never would have dared to stage appearances like that.

01-30-11, 09:51 PM	#25
Skybird Soaring Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: the mental asylum named Germany Posts: 42,649 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	"My points", as you ccall them, are not my points, but that of critics whose arguments I follow and just "quote": because they make sense to me, more sense than the official propaganda line at least, and because of the reputation and background of these critics. It is not my personal conspiration theory, but worries and concerns of insiders knowing the matter and links much better than I will ever do. And in the end the words of a Roman Herzog, Valery Giscard-d'Estaing and Helmut Schmidt have much more weight to me than those of an Angela Merkel, Manuel Barosso, Claude Juncker or Nobody Rumpoy. And if even the two fathers of the Eu treateies, Giscard-d'Estaing and Schmidt, criticise the shapew the EU has gotten during the last 20 years, then this tells me something. And Wulff, I think he jumps with a happy smile to snap the pralines Merkel is throwing to him when he did something the way she thinks he should. Blair was Bush's poodle, and Wulff is Merkel's. Gauck would have been the far better choice for the post, with far more moral integrity and authority. Wulff's submissive basic attitude is - ashaming.So much I rate all he did in office, as failings: that he made a Muslim close friend of a known Islamic and ultranationalistic Turk a minister in his old cabinet befor eleaving, his acting regarding the causa Sarrazin, his infantile christmas appearance on TV that was meant to be "innovative", and his latest stunt during the Auschwitz remembrance when he acted with masochistic submission and implied that generations of even not yet born Germans being responsible for what has happened 70 years ago. Disgusting, naive, and spineless. Gauck never would have dared to stage appearances like that. __________________ If you feel nuts, consult an expert.