Man must pay child support, DNA proves he's not the dad

Iceman · 01-12-09, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UnderseaLcpl

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neal Stevens

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kapt Z

First of all, there's a very good chance that the father isn't going to be able to continue a relationship with the children. That being said, why should he be forced to PAY for those children when, all that really is doing is shifting the financial burden to him from the mother?

He should be able to choose what to do, here.

Exactly. He should have the choice. He should be allowed to decide his relationship with these children, and how he wants to assist. The people responsible are the mother and the MIA father. They should be required to cover the cost of raising their children. Whenever it comes to $$$ the mother and judge always look to the man.

Freedom of choice? I like that answer.

Speaking in the "I know what your going thru category"..he should be given the choice now being he is not bilogical and if "decpetion" on the womans part could be proven....if it was honest...not sure how that would be the case though in infidelity....he should have a "choice now"...seeing he wasnt given one by the woman before.