N. Koreans Taped At Syrian Reactor

Happy Times · 04-25-08, 10:14 AM

Someone has to post this.

N. Koreans Taped At Syrian Reactor
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...opnews&sub=new

White House: Syria reactor not for 'peaceful' purposes
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS...ear/index.html

VIDEO OF THE REACTOR!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540...00852#24300852

Dowly · 04-25-08, 10:19 AM

"FROM THE U.S. GOVERNMENT"

Best joke I've seen in a looooong time.

Happy Times · 04-25-08, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dowly

"FROM THE U.S. GOVERNMENT"

Best joke I've seen in a looooong time.

Its really from Israel, and its true.

DeepIron · 04-25-08, 10:23 AM

David Albright, president of Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) and a former U.N. weapons inspector, said the absence of such evidence warrants skepticism that the reactor was part of an active weapons program.

Quote:

"The United States and Israel have not identified any Syrian plutonium separation facilities or nuclear weaponization facilities," he said. "The lack of any such facilities gives little confidence that the reactor is part of an active nuclear weapons program. The apparent lack of fuel, either imported or indigenously produced, also is curious and lowers confidence that Syria has a nuclear weapons program."

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck... It must be a nuclear weapons facility...

Quote:

Its really from Israel, and its true.

Oh yeah... THAT makes it credible...

Dowly · 04-25-08, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Times

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dowly

"FROM THE U.S. GOVERNMENT"

Best joke I've seen in a looooong time.

Its really from Israel, and its true.

Ah, ok then.

DAB · 04-25-08, 10:25 AM

It might even have been a news story across the globe if it hadn't been for the curious incident of the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq...

...even if its true, US credibility in this area is shot!

Happy Times · 04-25-08, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeepIron

David Albright, president of Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) and a former U.N. weapons inspector, said the absence of such evidence warrants skepticism that the reactor was part of an active weapons program.

Quote:

"The United States and Israel have not identified any Syrian plutonium separation facilities or nuclear weaponization facilities," he said. "The lack of any such facilities gives little confidence that the reactor is part of an active nuclear weapons program. The apparent lack of fuel, either imported or indigenously produced, also is curious and lowers confidence that Syria has a nuclear weapons program."

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck... It must be a nuclear weapons facility...

Exactly, why else would they build a reactor in the middle of desert in secret. The scientists could be angry they didnt get to go and do an inspection. The other facilities could be anywhere in Syria. This could also be disinformation toward the Syrians.

Happy Times · 04-25-08, 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeepIron

David Albright, president of Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) and a former U.N. weapons inspector, said the absence of such evidence warrants skepticism that the reactor was part of an active weapons program.

Quote:

"The United States and Israel have not identified any Syrian plutonium separation facilities or nuclear weaponization facilities," he said. "The lack of any such facilities gives little confidence that the reactor is part of an active nuclear weapons program. The apparent lack of fuel, either imported or indigenously produced, also is curious and lowers confidence that Syria has a nuclear weapons program."

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck... It must be a nuclear weapons facility...

Quote:

Its really from Israel, and its true.

Oh yeah... THAT makes it credible...

So what do you think it is? A warehouse?

DeepIron · 04-25-08, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Exactly, why else would they build a reactor in the middle of desert in secret.

A. Because they can.
B. To keep the Americans from declaring another "WMD Event" and thereby launching YAW (Yet Another War) against a "terrorist state".
C. Give the Israeli Intelligence and Military something to do besides wipe out Palestinians...
D. Insert favorite "terrorists with nukes" fear here.

Quote:

So what do you think it is? A warehouse?

Right now, it appeared to be a.... building.

Do you know FOR SURE what it was? Outside of what the government and media tell you, you don't know anymore than anyone else.

Dowly · 04-25-08, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeepIron

Outside of what the government and media tell you, you don't know anymore than anyone else.

Happy Times · 04-25-08, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeepIron

Quote:

Exactly, why else would they build a reactor in the middle of desert in secret.

A. Because they can.
B. To keep the Americans from declaring another "WMD Event" and thereby launching YAW (Yet Another War) against a "terrorist state".
C. Give the Israeli Intelligence and Military something to do besides wipe out Palestinians...
D. Insert favorite "terrorists with nukes" fear here.

Are you serious?

DeepIron · 04-25-08, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Times

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeepIron

Quote:

Exactly, why else would they build a reactor in the middle of desert in secret.

A. Because they can.
B. To keep the Americans from declaring another "WMD Event" and thereby launching YAW (Yet Another War) against a "terrorist state".
C. Give the Israeli Intelligence and Military something to do besides wipe out Palestinians...
D. Insert favorite "terrorists with nukes" fear here.

Are you serious?

Are you? Just because the Israeli's or the US "says" it was "not intended for peaceful use" doesn't mean it's true. Where are the rest of the processing facilities?

Quote:

A covert nuclear reactor destroyed last year in Syria would have been capable of producing plutonium and probably was "not intended for peaceful purposes," the White House said Thursday.

The operative word here is "probably", same word that got us involved in Iraq "probable WMDs"... There is NO hard evidence AT ALL to prove that this facility was intended to produce plutonium. NONE. NADA. ZIP.

Quote:

But senior intelligence officials later said they had only low confidence that the facility was meant to build nuclear weapons.

'nuff said...

Happy Times · 04-25-08, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeepIron

Quote:

Exactly, why else would they build a reactor in the middle of desert in secret.

A. Because they can.
B. To keep the Americans from declaring another "WMD Event" and thereby launching YAW (Yet Another War) against a "terrorist state".
C. Give the Israeli Intelligence and Military something to do besides wipe out Palestinians...
D. Insert favorite "terrorists with nukes" fear here.

Quote:

So what do you think it is? A warehouse?

Right now, it appeared to be a.... building.

Do you know FOR SURE what it was? Outside of what the government and media tell you, you don't know anymore than anyone else.

Funny thing, when the first rumors of the bombing came last year, only the region where the bombing happened was told. So i took a look in google Google Earth, i found the reactor in 30min and put an needle in it. Its THAT obvious. I now that truth wont penetrate your tinfoil hat, so i wont make a real effort.

August · 04-25-08, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Times

I now that truth wont penetrate your tinfoil hat, so i wont make a real effort.

:rotfl:

caspofungin · 04-25-08, 11:01 AM

happy times, arbiter of truth.

maybe it was, maybe it wasn't. we can't depend on eithe side to tell us the truth, only their version of events.

04-25-08, 10:14 AM	#1
Happy Times Ocean Warrior Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Finland Posts: 2,950 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	N. Koreans Taped At Syrian Reactor Someone has to post this. N. Koreans Taped At Syrian Reactor http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...opnews&sub=new White House: Syria reactor not for 'peaceful' purposes http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS...ear/index.html VIDEO OF THE REACTOR! http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540...00852#24300852 __________________

04-25-08, 10:25 AM	#6
DAB Lieutenant Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 263 Downloads: 5 Uploads: 0	It might even have been a news story across the globe if it hadn't been for the curious incident of the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq... ...even if its true, US credibility in this area is shot! __________________ ...snorting / snorkelling after several years of silent running.

04-25-08, 10:19 AM	#2
Dowly Lucky Jack Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Finland Posts: 25,052 Downloads: 32 Uploads: 0	"FROM THE U.S. GOVERNMENT" Best joke I've seen in a looooong time.

04-25-08, 11:01 AM	#15
caspofungin Commander Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 459 Downloads: 41 Uploads: 0	happy times, arbiter of truth. maybe it was, maybe it wasn't. we can't depend on eithe side to tell us the truth, only their version of events.