![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Hi Guys!
Has anyone ever had any trouble with the SSMs in Dangerous Waters having no sensors and getting them to have some effectiveness? Lately I've been experimenting with them and they seem especially oblivious. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]()
What SSM, what target?
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]()
There is nothing by that name in the database, so I can't look up its sensor.
EDIT: Are you talking about the Yugo Midget Subs assigned to the DPRK? If so, the stock database doesn't assign them any sensors at all. If you're using LWAMI they have a visual sensor and should be able to make periscope attacks--or at least could, if its weapon was ASUW capable. I guess we can add that to the list.
__________________
![]() Last edited by Molon Labe; 04-13-08 at 12:45 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
It doesn't make much sense to give a submarine which only has a periscope a weapon with which it can't target surface vessels. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]()
Well the smallest wakehomer I think we have is the 53-56K, which isn't small by any means. I was thinking something along the lines of a 40cm-job, like the USET-95.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
That'd work too. I don't think it really matters, honestly. I'd rather see them modeled with a HWT than a LWT, though. LWT are generally intended as ASW weapons. HWT are for destroying big ships. Other than that, don't think the size of the torpedo really matters.
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]()
You're right. The Yugo is in fact armed with 53cm torpedo tubes. So a HWT it will be.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Soundman
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Compartment № 5 /Silos/
Posts: 149
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
For example set-65E or SAET-60 - old Soviet torpedos.
__________________
-+= I the ocean hunter, and I am dangerous =+- *** Kalashnikov - the best *** |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|