![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I was reading something, and found this question in an article. Maybe we can answer this question here!
![]() -S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,874
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Off the top of me head...
Reason - To look cool, and to give a catchy name "Real" Reason - I think they were radiators for waste heat dissipation, they had to be open for blaster use, doubling surface area. Also, didn't they fly in atmosphere at some point? This question could be kinda pointless, seeing as antigrav or some sort of VTOL was in effect.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Figueira da Foz, Portugal
Posts: 4,517
Downloads: 110
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
To do atmosferic manovers in planets? or it's a good place to put laser canons... :hmm:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: At periscope depth in Lake Geneva
Posts: 3,512
Downloads: 25
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
They still needed to be aerodynamic even if they didn't need the wing's "lift." Note everything I've read is that TIE fighters could NOT fight in atmospheres.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]()
All i know, is TIE means "Twin Ion Engine".
Why do X wings the way they are? Not a clue. I guess it just looked cool. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Well, since there is hardly anything scientific to be found in Star Wars, it's kind of an exercise in futility, but my theory is because it looks cool.
In my opinion however, the best best best Outer space sci fi still is the vulnerable 2001 a Space Odyssey. Nothing can touch it accuracy, such as no sound in space, etc. That was an accurate movie. Anyway, Star Wars is still fun. I guess if I want to get closer to accuracy, then I need to go Star Trek, but still, that is a little bogus in cases too. -S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]()
Well, its not called Science-Fiction for nothing.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I should add some background: ![]() Officially, “The wings not only serve as stabilizer surfaces in air travel, but also distribute deflector shield energy and serve as weapons mounts.” Poppycock. Clearly, the wings have nothing to do with aerodynamics, as there is nothing aerodynamic about 99% of the vessels in the Star Wars universe, and almost everything short of the Death Star makes controlled landfall and takeoff. (Seriously, how does the Millennium Falcon do it? It’s a stunted frisbee! Eh, a question for another day…) As to the suggestion that the so-called “S-foils” are used to generate deflector shields, that doesn’t explain how the other fighters in the Rebel fleet create defensive energy screens (well, maybe the B-Wing). It just doesn’t add up. Now, I grant you, looking for science in Star Wars is a largely a futile gesture (Parsecs are a unit of distance, not time!), but we can have fun trying, anyway. The Sci-Fi Apologist has an amusing wing-theory: The x-wings are really heat sinks for the high-powered laser cannons. Cute, but I think we can do better. So, here’s your assignment, boys and girls: What’s the REAL reason X-Wing starfighters have wings? Let the theorizing begin! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Wikipedia is really deficient in star wars' ship info.
also the TIE fight Twin Ion engine that gives great speed...hmmmmmm As I understand it there are a few space probes out there that are using ion drive engines to get them to their targets. My understanding was that the thrust from these is gentle but constant not wham bam like a rocket, so should TIE fighters be really slow and unable to change direction quickly? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,778
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
"That was an accurate movie."
Define accurate. Dust clouds billowed on the Moon. The drink in the straw in zero gravity fell back down. And this: http://www.moviemistakes.com/film8 And this: http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/amk/doc/gaffe.html And this: http://www.continuitycorner.com/Tfilm/00104.htm There are many others but my point is made, I think. Anyway, it's all relative. And everyone knows the most accurate movie ever made is Plan 9 From Outer Space anyway! :P
__________________
"You will take on England wherever you find her ships, and you will break her power at sea." --Iron Coffins, Herbert A. Werner http://kennethmarkhoover.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Estland
Posts: 4,330
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CATALINA IS. SO . CAL USA
Posts: 10,108
Downloads: 511
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The one with the best answer gets the title
KING NERD the 1st. :rotfl: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() Join Date: May 2004
Location: Aeoteroa
Posts: 7,382
Downloads: 223
Uploads: 1
|
![]()
Also another one i heard - In space theres no air right so when a engine is burning fuel there should be no trails of smoke etc, showing from the engines exhaust, yet in alot of movies/games the crafts have smoke trails. :hmm:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Born to Run Silent
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
SUBSIM - 26 Years on the Web |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|