SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-28-07, 02:11 AM   #31
The Avon Lady
Über Mom
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 6,147
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Yep. Banning half measures will solve a lot of problems, narcotics and more.
__________________


"Victory will come to us from the wombs of our women."
- Houari Boumedienne, President of Algeria, Speech before the UN, 1974
The Avon Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-07, 10:12 AM   #32
swifty
Soundman
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 141
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
I think this is a great way to get ships for target practice! The US should adopt their policies on this issue! We even get submarines around here that we can practice torpedoing!

-S
In a way they all ready do. When an US submarine receives a new MK-46 it doesn't have a war head. The torpedo must be test fired 2 to 3 times before it is made deadly. This ensures that all guidance and stacking are working property, don't want the thing turning back on you. At $52 million I don't see the need to be blowing them up.
swifty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-07, 11:57 AM   #33
VonHammer
Engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 218
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swifty
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
I think this is a great way to get ships for target practice! The US should adopt their policies on this issue! We even get submarines around here that we can practice torpedoing!

-S
In a way they all ready do. When an US submarine receives a new MK-46 it doesn't have a war head. The torpedo must be test fired 2 to 3 times before it is made deadly. This ensures that all guidance and stacking are working property, don't want the thing turning back on you. At $52 million I don't see the need to be blowing them up.
i guess that makes sense. thats just hard to belive that a torpedo can cost $52 million. well and it would be a waste of our tax dolloars
VonHammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-07, 12:40 PM   #34
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swifty
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
I think this is a great way to get ships for target practice! The US should adopt their policies on this issue! We even get submarines around here that we can practice torpedoing!

-S
In a way they all ready do. When an US submarine receives a new MK-46 it doesn't have a war head. The torpedo must be test fired 2 to 3 times before it is made deadly. This ensures that all guidance and stacking are working property, don't want the thing turning back on you. At $52 million I don't see the need to be blowing them up.
The torpedo unit production costs from approximately $1.2-$1.4M million apiece. I can't see the warhead costing 40+ times the cost of a tomahawk though, even for a nuke configuration. A mk48 adcap with 650lb HE warhead only cost 2.5 million.

Last edited by bradclark1; 08-28-07 at 12:54 PM.
bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-07, 01:54 PM   #35
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

2.5 mil a fish huh? Maybe we should be arming our subs with a half load of old Mk 14s. That way they can still fight Ivan or whoever's SSNs and still have a cost effective time sinking Iranian patrol boats. :hmm:
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-07, 03:07 PM   #36
VonHammer
Engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 218
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

or they could outsource the production to china but they mite need to get recalled for to much lead paint
VonHammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-07, 03:43 PM   #37
swifty
Soundman
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 141
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
The torpedo unit production costs from approximately $1.2-$1.4M million apiece. I can't see the warhead costing 40+ times the cost of a tomahawk though, even for a nuke configuration. A mk48 adcap with 650lb HE warhead only cost 2.5 million.
Your right I miss read the data sheet in 1999 26 were purchased for 52.8 mill.
http://www.fas.org/man/docs/fy99/navy/osdp1_wpn_u.pdf

Quote:
Cost estimates for this weapon (MK48) are around $2 million each, rising to almost $3 million in some cases with upgrades factored in. source
swifty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-07, 05:36 PM   #38
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swifty
Quote:
Cost estimates for this weapon (MK48) are around $2 million each, rising to almost $3 million in some cases with upgrades factored in. source
Bottom line is I think we need to bring back the deck gun.
bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-07, 06:42 PM   #39
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradclark1
Quote:
Originally Posted by swifty
Quote:
Cost estimates for this weapon (MK48) are around $2 million each, rising to almost $3 million in some cases with upgrades factored in. source
Bottom line is I think we need to bring back the deck gun.
But the gun will cost $8 million and each shell $5,000 due to mark ups! Don't get me started on the increase in cost for insurance and OH&S training!
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-07, 06:44 PM   #40
VonHammer
Engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 218
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

yea and with todays technology im sure they can even have it conceled some where for when theryre underwater. and it probaly be more acurte to.
VonHammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-07, 09:01 PM   #41
Heibges
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diver
Quote:
Originally Posted by CptSimFreak
Why not capture it and sell it? They could've made few quick greenbacks.
We did capture it.

But the thing was svery un-seaworthy, it really wasn't wrth selling.

Okay guys I think some of you are getting the wrong idea

The following did not happen:
We found an NK ship, suspected of running drugs and got the RAAF to blast it to pieces with a dumb bomb, with crew onboard and all.

The following however, did happen:
The pong su was tracked down the coast, it attempted to conduct a drugs transfer of the victorian coast, whilst under fed surveillance. guys on the ground were caught. ship attempted to bolt back up north. was pursued by a frigate. was boarded, crew captured. was taken into port. a few years later. after all evidence was bagged tagged, and addmitted into court. and after the ship was assesed as being unseaworthy and useless. It was taken out to sea. stopped dead in the water, and because no RAN assets were available for a live fire ex. the RAAF just blew it up for show.
Ah, it was in bad shape.

My friend bought a 23 ft Baja with twin 350 hp merc-cruisers for $5k at one of those Government Drug options here in the United States.
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface.

http://www.hackworth.com/
Heibges is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-07, 08:10 AM   #42
VonHammer
Engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 218
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

thats qutie a steal there. anyone see the Family Guy epsoide when peter, joe, clevland and glenn go to the police actuion and peter buys the boat? btw my grandpa has a 35ft Marlago center console with twin yamaha 250s
VonHammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-07, 09:17 AM   #43
Heibges
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Another guy offered my friend $10k for it the very same day.

But unfortunately, my friend kept the boat, did a lot of damage to it, and I don't remember if he made his money back or not.

But we had a great time on Lake Sunapee in New Hampshire for a couple of summers.
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface.

http://www.hackworth.com/
Heibges is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.