![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 | |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22048954-2,00.html |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,477
Downloads: 18
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Damn, if we don't die from a comet or blow ourselves up with nukes then the future is pretty sweet!
![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 2,537
Downloads: 129
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Though I've heard that Star Trek teleportation was impossible basically because the act of teleporting isn't actually moving anything but of destroying the atoms at one end and creating them at the other. Then you aren't beaming someone but killing them and duplicating them, and even then if it could reach that scale of function you don't know if the person would actually live through it.
I think its just a bit of dramatic fluff really. Lasers, yes. Warp speed, probably. Teleportation? Naw. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,448
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Under a thermal layer in chilly Olde England
Posts: 1,842
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Well I know for a fact that there are aliens that have teleported people to my hometown, because it's full of people that are most definitely 'not from this planet'
:rotfl: ![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Über Mom
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 6,147
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]() "Help me-e-e-e-e-e-e!!!! Help me-e-e-e-e-e-e!!!!"
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Eternal Patrol
![]() Join Date: May 2004
Location: Aeoteroa
Posts: 7,382
Downloads: 223
Uploads: 1
|
![]() Quote:
Maybe in 10,000 years in the future human teleportation might happen, till then experimental teleportation of humans will end with results similar to the Ripley clones in Aliens Resurrection ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,509
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Soon all your bases will be transported to us!
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I love the "teleporter paradox". Its a phillosophical paradox that goes thusly:
"The year is 2500, and teleportation technology has been perfected for use on humans in interstellar travels. This is how the human teleporter works: instead of actually sending you (with all of your atoms) through space-time, it simply scans your body, capturing all the information on every subatomic particle in your body at an instant (assume that they got around Heisenberg's uncertainty principle), at which point your body is destroyed (don't worry, you are put under anaesthetic for the procedure), while the information of those atoms gets transmitted to the destination, where a machine will synthesise an exact replica of you (exactly the same down to the subatomic level) using new atoms. You then wake up in a different galaxy (after the anaesthetics wear off - and the anaesthetics would also be 'teleported' by the way), with all your memory before the teleportation intact, convinced that you have survived the procedure. Of course the atoms are all new, but isn't the new body still the same 'you'? (In real life, every atom in our body eventually gets replaced anyway.) Now let's add a twist. Instead of destroying your original body, it is preserved during the scanning process. So now we have TWO copies of you: the original one, and the replica. Both of them are identical down to the last atom, and should be behaviourally indistinguishable (because they have the same physical makeup, materialism states that they must be identical in every way.) But surely you can't be in two places at once! If 'you' survived at all, isn't it obvious that you survive as your original self, not the clone? But what's the difference between your original self and the clone anyway? Both of you would behave in exactly the same way, and both would have the same thoughts (at least initially, when there has been no divergence in the environment). So did you really survive the procedure afterall? If you didn't, doesn't that point to the existence of something other than your physical body including the information contained within the arrangement of the atoms? Is there a difference between the scenario with one original body and one clone, and the scenario where I destroy your original body, and create two(or more!) clones instead? In each case, is it so clear that 'you' will survive, and survive in one of the individuals/clones?" One thing to keep in mind when thinking over this paradox is the fact that you have very, very few of the atoms in your body that you where born with.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I remeber reading somewhere that even if you transport a human and rebuild them in one piece, you would turn their brain state back to the equiviant of a new born child.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Über Mom
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 6,147
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,509
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
By those theories we can come to the conclusion that life is not just the atomic makeup of our bodies but also consists of our "soul" aka life.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
This is a scientific point of view because it assumes that thought and consciousness are products of the physical state of the brain. Quote:
There is no way we can come to such a conclusion with out physically trying the paradox. It is just one of 2 main conclusions; either: 1) Consciousness and thought are results of physical brain states and the teleportation will not alter the stream of consciousness. or 2) Consciousness and thought are non-physical and teleportation will alter the stream of consciousness. Option '2' comes with it's own set of questions: a) To what is the stream of consciousness attached? b) How does something non-physical interact with something physical? Option '1' is more simple, but more puzzling. It does not throw up any major logic puzzles, but it supposes that all qualia (including that of consciousness) are physical. This is counterintuitive because that does not seam to be how we experience qualia. If you thus take option '1' to be false; a new paradox arises: How would we experience the world differently if all qualia where physical?
__________________
![]() Last edited by Letum; 07-13-07 at 01:08 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,509
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
It is a very interesting subject to think about. I must admit that i'm not on an educated level to keep up (i understood what you said yet have never encountered the word qualia) however I do think that many questions would be answered if we could attempt a 'perfect teleport.'
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 2,537
Downloads: 129
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|