SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > SHIII Mods Workshop
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-19-07, 05:36 AM   #16
poor sailor
XO
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Serbia
Posts: 420
Downloads: 15
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dantenoc
I agree that planes should be something to be feared, and that intentionaly fighting it out with attacking bombers should be discouraged. However, to date my experience with GWX (1.02) has been that I don't even get a chance to yell "crash dive" to my crew. I try to play at TCx64 when in english controled waters, and I still get surprised by the enemy planes in the silliest of ways. My crew just don't spot them untill AFTER they've made their first run over my boat. This is all in early war ('39, '40), with the watch tower bar all filled up in green, regardless of weather or day and night condition.

Because of this I play the game as if I was driving a true submarine, staying submerged for all of the day, and surfacing for 3 or 4 hours at night to recharge batteries. It gives me a lot of advantages to play like this (more sonar contacts and longer patrol ranges exploiting the weak "create free energy out of nothing through the batteries" game bug) but it's hardly historicaly accurate.

Let's hope this issue is resolved in the next patch , and we all still yell "crash dive" as soon as we see an airplane... just as long as we get the chance to see the airplane to begin with.
For me situations with planes works very well. I using GWX v.1.02 but also use the mod by Ducimus "AI sensors from NYGM". When my crew tells me "Aircraft spotted" I have enough time to crash dive normal and prevent the attack on me. Maybe I have been long with NYGM, but very like their sensors in game and now have it in GWX.Thanks to Ducimus for this addition!
poor sailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 06:30 AM   #17
kiwikapitan
Helmsman
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Aotearoa
Posts: 108
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbuna
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboywooly
Once shot down 20+ Swordfish in the channel in 39
One after the other they came like Lemmings

And not a scratch on the boat
Well I once shot down 21+ and had the crew add an extra coat of varnish on the hull whist I was buisy doing it ....j/k :rotfl:
Hrumph try doing that with the full LRT 1.32 mod by NVdrifter. You will die FAST!
__________________
Proud GWX user! but currently on WAC holiday....
kiwikapitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 09:49 AM   #18
bigboywooly
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Swindon, England
Posts: 10,151
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
Default

That was in stock Kiwi
Where the aircraft are useless at best
__________________


My mediafire page http://www.mediafire.com/?11eoq19bq9r41
bigboywooly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 12:26 PM   #19
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,266
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

In all reality we still got it easy. Try a FIDO up the wahzoo and a set of sonar bouy dropped around you to track your movements. I'll take the GWX planes that we have
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 12:44 PM   #20
Ducimus
Rear Admiral
 
Ducimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,987
Downloads: 67
Uploads: 2


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboywooly
Your snorkel is visible from the air as it leaves a wake

Not meaning to be argumentative, but is there any proof of that?

Using a snorkel, a sub couldnt do more then 2 or 3 kts or it would knock the mast down. That can't leave much of a wake. And visibility of that is doubtful if you consider sea state (even small waves can obscurve visilbity with an object that size), and altitude and speed of an aircraft. In short, it was more then likely, TOO SMALL to see unless it was glassy calm sea.


Radar however, is another matter.
Ducimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 12:59 PM   #21
bigboywooly
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Swindon, England
Posts: 10,151
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
Default

According to uboat.net the top speed with a snorkel was 6 knots
Not a great deal faster but would certainly make the wake longer

You may be right though
__________________


My mediafire page http://www.mediafire.com/?11eoq19bq9r41
bigboywooly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 01:25 PM   #22
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,266
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Please note the snokel was detectable by radar. Wake or not the Allies could pick it up.

http://inventors.about.com/library/i...submarine9.htm

Please note the part of snokels and radar near the bottom of article.

From article "Using a snorkel a submarine could run its diesel engines and recharge its batteries while operating just below the surface. Air for the diesel engines was drawn into the submarine through the snorkel that was extended to the surface. To some extent the snorkel reduced vulnerability to detection and attack, but it protruded above the surface and could be detected by radar. The Germans introduced the snorkel too late in the war to make a difference."
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 01:51 PM   #23
STEED
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Down Town UK
Posts: 27,695
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 48


Default

Stock was great for a shoot out on the surface even in 1945 wave after wave of those dumb planes would swoop down on me and get shot up. I even ran out of ammo I was having a field day.

But those spoil sports came along with GWX. Those days are over for sure, I would never go back to stock. Long live GWX
__________________
Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017.

To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT!
STEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 04:34 PM   #24
Pablo
Commodore
 
Pablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 641
Downloads: 168
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducimus
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboywooly
Your snorkel is visible from the air as it leaves a wake
Not meaning to be argumentative, but is there any proof of that?

Using a snorkel, a sub couldnt do more then 2 or 3 kts or it would knock the mast down. That can't leave much of a wake. And visibility of that is doubtful if you consider sea state (even small waves can obscurve visilbity with an object that size), and altitude and speed of an aircraft. In short, it was more then likely, TOO SMALL to see unless it was glassy calm sea.


Radar however, is another matter.
Hi!

As BBW pointed out (citing www.uboat.net), the maximum speed IRL was 6 knots. The problem with the sea state is that it cuts both ways: waves large enough to disrupt the wake or to create whitecaps that would obscure the wake could also flood over the schnorchel head, temporarily cutting off the air flow into the U-boat and possibly damaging the schnorchel itself.

Running with the schnorchel higher out of the water could keep the air flowing but would also make it more visible to the S-band radar with which almost all Allied search aircraft were equipped by the time the schnorchel came into general use: they might not see the exposed head in rough seas, but they could definitely detect that fat stovepipe rising above the waves.

The ascendency of ASW detection and destruction technology over submarine technology extant at the end of WWII was one of the main justifications for pushing ahead with nuclear-powered submarines.

Pablo
Pablo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 04:59 PM   #25
Ducimus
Rear Admiral
 
Ducimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,987
Downloads: 67
Uploads: 2


Default

My point still stands though, visually, it was nearly undetectable by an airplane given the sea's, and speed and altitude of aircraft. And again, radar is another matter. To reiterate, 03 cm radar makes things VERY detectable, but visually? Unless glassy calm, i dont think so.
Ducimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.