![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#16 | |
XO
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Serbia
Posts: 420
Downloads: 15
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||
Helmsman
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Aotearoa
Posts: 108
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Proud GWX user! ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Swindon, England
Posts: 10,151
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
That was in stock Kiwi
Where the aircraft are useless at best |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
In all reality we still got it easy. Try a FIDO up the wahzoo and a set of sonar bouy dropped around you to track your movements.
![]() ![]()
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.” ― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Not meaning to be argumentative, but is there any proof of that? Using a snorkel, a sub couldnt do more then 2 or 3 kts or it would knock the mast down. That can't leave much of a wake. And visibility of that is doubtful if you consider sea state (even small waves can obscurve visilbity with an object that size), and altitude and speed of an aircraft. In short, it was more then likely, TOO SMALL to see unless it was glassy calm sea. Radar however, is another matter. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Swindon, England
Posts: 10,151
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
According to uboat.net the top speed with a snorkel was 6 knots
Not a great deal faster but would certainly make the wake longer You may be right though |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
Please note the snokel was detectable by radar. Wake or not the Allies could pick it up.
http://inventors.about.com/library/i...submarine9.htm Please note the part of snokels and radar near the bottom of article. From article "Using a snorkel a submarine could run its diesel engines and recharge its batteries while operating just below the surface. Air for the diesel engines was drawn into the submarine through the snorkel that was extended to the surface. To some extent the snorkel reduced vulnerability to detection and attack, but it protruded above the surface and could be detected by radar. The Germans introduced the snorkel too late in the war to make a difference."
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.” ― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
Stock was great for a shoot out on the surface even in 1945 wave after wave of those dumb planes would swoop down on me and get shot up. I even ran out of ammo I was having a field day.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() But those spoil sports came along with GWX. ![]() ![]()
__________________
Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. ![]() To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | ||
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 641
Downloads: 168
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
As BBW pointed out (citing www.uboat.net), the maximum speed IRL was 6 knots. The problem with the sea state is that it cuts both ways: waves large enough to disrupt the wake or to create whitecaps that would obscure the wake could also flood over the schnorchel head, temporarily cutting off the air flow into the U-boat and possibly damaging the schnorchel itself. Running with the schnorchel higher out of the water could keep the air flowing but would also make it more visible to the S-band radar with which almost all Allied search aircraft were equipped by the time the schnorchel came into general use: they might not see the exposed head in rough seas, but they could definitely detect that fat stovepipe rising above the waves. The ascendency of ASW detection and destruction technology over submarine technology extant at the end of WWII was one of the main justifications for pushing ahead with nuclear-powered submarines. Pablo |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]()
My point still stands though, visually, it was nearly undetectable by an airplane given the sea's, and speed and altitude of aircraft. And again, radar is another matter. To reiterate, 03 cm radar makes things VERY detectable, but visually? Unless glassy calm, i dont think so.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|