![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#16 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
nukes are loud. plain and simple. the prop wash is loud, and so is the blades smacking the water.
solution: hand cranked paddles. ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Virginia: Depth: ~1600 ft. speed: ~42-45 kts max Seawolf: Depth: ~1900 ft speed: ~34-38 kts max goatland (had to spell it like that): Depth: ~900-1100 ft Speed: no more than 30 kts Ohio SSBN: Depth: ~1100 ft max Speed: ~30-32 kts max
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
I doubt the virginia could hit 42 to 45 knots maybe 36 to 38.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,140
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
"The true speed is classified" with "The true speed must be at least 10 knots more than what the common estimates say it is." Considering the physics involved, it is more futile to try and make major lies about speed than about other aspects, like depth. The Americans tried that futile stupidity and I bet they didn't fool a single person who really cared. If lies are to be made, it is more profitable to make it in depth - it is easier to generate an upper limit based on known limits of metallurgy than to really get the correct depth which is a weak-link-in-countless-systems situation. It will take some serious research for them to find that weak valve you had in Frame 108 that will faill 100 meters before everything else... Of course, since according to the Americans especially, the real winners in underwater are silencing and sonar (electronics). Both are areas where huge whoppers can be made and no one can be the wiser. But speed? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |||
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Here is the wikipedia link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collins_class_submarine |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Sailor man
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 49
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Reading all this bantering about nuke vs electric. It all lreally depends on what kinda waters you are in too. A nuke must keep curculation water while in latoral waters (remember, the cold wars over, and most battles are seeming to be fought in shallower coastal waters these days), while an electric can effectivly shut everything down and just wait like a giant ass-kicking sea mine, making as much noise "as a lightbulb"
And for all these speedy top speeds..... sure you can go balls to to the wall, but its like hunting from a freighttrain. The whole world can hear you, but you have no idea whats anywhere. The old Alpha Soviet boats were a prime example. As fast as they were useless, and man, were they fast. So speed is nice and all, but I would be more worried about a puttering little diesel anyday over a nuke. Thats my 2 bits. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
Even an old whiskey, romeo, or foxtrot could kill a nuke if it just sat there.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
or my (still in planning phase) 'midget sub of death'
It will be the envy of the world. ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,898
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Do not forget that the crew of an antique stationary diesel may be on a suicide mission with the promise of paradise after their death!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 3,234
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
So in other words, the day Sweden declares war, you're screwed. Better build that bomb shelter quickly, then:p.
[/Swede-teasing] Heck, the Swedish military is impressive. The Visby-class stealth corvette, the JAS-39 Gripen fighter jet that can touch down on ordinary roads, and now this u-boat that even has the mighty USA stomped.
__________________
Last edited by Safe-Keeper; 11-06-06 at 10:38 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
Oh yes the mighty swedes who in 1982 couldnt see a whiskey class submarine fully surfaced inside thier own waters even though it was a stone throw away from the shore, the only time they did notice it was when it ran aground even then they were a bit slow off the mark
![]()
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,140
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
Japan is a good naval force most of thier ships are home built and designed its just the kongo class design was borrowd from the americans and streached to suite japanese needs, also the japanese submarines have whats called progressive decomissioning and its the only navy to do it.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,247
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
So now that you're all done with the technical part, how about some strategy?
AIP subs deny you access to a coastal sea zone, what are your options? 1. Find another way in, maybe use giant flying wings/zeppelins to land your troops (actually I just want the tech developed for civvie use). 2. Do the Pearl Harbor and start the war with the bombing of the subs while they're in port/vulnerable/pin-pointed. 3. Get your own AIP hunter subs in there somehow, that's gonna be a long journey. 4. Build a giant airborne fishing net connected to an EMP generator (3 giant flying wings/zeppelins) and sweep the sea zone frying any subs that come in contact with the net. 5. Call the Ghostbusters. 6. Call in the Thunderbirds. 7. Use decoys: send in a large remote-controlled fleet of cheap WW2 Liberty Ships equipped with massive decoying devices to completely blind the subs, the rest of your force stay sharp to shut down the decoys at any moment and detect the subs that started moving. 8. Send in Kapitain in the Jahre Viking, with a keel that deep chances are he'll ram the subs. Any other simple solutions? #7 seems pretty reasonable, if you can't hear you can't aim and if you can't aim you can't shoot and if you do shoot you can only hit a worthless decoy.
__________________
"Tout ce qui est exagéré est insignifiant." ("All that is exaggerated is insignificant.") - Talleyrand |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
HEY !!! im not that bad !
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|