SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-21-06, 06:50 AM   #1
Kapitan
Sub Test Pilot
 
Kapitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK + Canada
Posts: 7,130
Downloads: 77
Uploads: 7


Default In your humble opinion

What is the best submarine in the world?

For me the best submarine is the german type 214 or 212 i love them boats the second being the russian Delta IV class SSBN.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond



Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/

Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/

Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/
Kapitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-06, 07:00 AM   #2
Takeda Shingen
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default



There's always a long line for the Nautilus.
Takeda Shingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-06, 08:49 AM   #3
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Hmmmm....depends on your classification of the word 'best', I mean the 212 and 214 are probably some of the quietest boats in the world...but I would choose an Alfa over them because of the radical design and beauty of the boat.

After that monologue though, I think I would choose the Oberon (Gods, what a surprise!!), with a close second being the Sierra II. Dunno what it is about the Sierra II, but she has a hold on me.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-06, 11:38 AM   #4
ASWnut101
Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
Default

Me like the Delta, too. If only it didn't have such a weird rudder.....
But the best (and I know its not a kilo) has to be:



second (maby first) fastest sub in the world.
quietest nuclear sub in the world.
most expensive sub in the world.
Deepest diving SSN in the US fleet.
most advanced sub in the world.

beat it.
__________________

ASWnut101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-06, 12:23 PM   #5
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ASWnut101
Me like the Delta, too. If only it didn't have such a weird rudder.....
But the best (and I know its not a kilo) has to be:



second (maby first) fastest sub in the world.
quietest nuclear sub in the world.
most expensive sub in the world.
Deepest diving SSN in the US fleet.
most advanced sub in the world.

beat it.
I have to point out that the Alfa is not only faster than the Seawolf, but it is also the deepest diving for an attack sub. 2500 feet last I saw, and it will do 45 to 50 knots. Of course my data may be old, but I know it beats the Seawolf in those two areas.

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-06, 12:24 PM   #6
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Here are the Alfa specs:

Laid down: 1974 Launched: 1977 Commissioned: 1977 General Characteristics Displacement: 2300 tons surfaced, 3200 tonnes submerged Length: 81.4 metres Beam: 9.5 metres Draught: 7.6 metres Propulsion: OK-155 or BM-40A, 155-MWt Lead cooled fast reactor
40000 shp steam turbine, one shaft Speed: 18-24 knots surfaced, 43-45 knots submerged Depth: 800 m test, 1300 m crush Complement: 27 officers, 4 petty officers Armament: Six 533-mm (21-inch) torpedo tubes:
18 SET-65 or 53-65K torpedoes
20 VA-111 Shkval torpedoes
21 SS-N-15 cruise missiles
12 SS-N-16 cruise missiles
24 mines

1300 meters = 4265 feet (That is deep)

45 knots is damn fast too. that is just barely over 51 MPH. Getting close to torpedo territory.
__________________

Last edited by SUBMAN1; 10-21-06 at 12:27 PM.
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-06, 01:14 PM   #7
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,637
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ASWnut101
beat it.
Depends on place, time, environment, and the comparison of the efficiency of the sonar suits of both competing boats. Your choice is not invulnerable, and can be beaten.

I probably would also choose the 212/214, if I could choose the place. Can't get any quieter than this, currently, and some grim armament possible.

If needing to patrol globally, I probably would choose a nuclear boat, too.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is online   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-06, 01:16 PM   #8
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,637
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
Here are the Alfa specs:

Laid down: 1974 Launched: 1977 Commissioned: 1977 General Characteristics Displacement: 2300 tons surfaced, 3200 tonnes submerged Length: 81.4 metres Beam: 9.5 metres Draught: 7.6 metres Propulsion: OK-155 or BM-40A, 155-MWt Lead cooled fast reactor
40000 shp steam turbine, one shaft Speed: 18-24 knots surfaced, 43-45 knots submerged Depth: 800 m test, 1300 m crush Complement: 27 officers, 4 petty officers Armament: Six 533-mm (21-inch) torpedo tubes:
18 SET-65 or 53-65K torpedoes
20 VA-111 Shkval torpedoes
21 SS-N-15 cruise missiles
12 SS-N-16 cruise missiles
24 mines

1300 meters = 4265 feet (That is deep)

45 knots is damn fast too. that is just barely over 51 MPH. Getting close to torpedo territory.
At that speed it would not trigger additional attention if they had attached a siren to the nose like those StuKas once had.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is online   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-06, 02:29 PM   #9
JSLTIGER
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Parkland, FL, USA
Posts: 1,437
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
Here are the Alfa specs:

Laid down: 1974 Launched: 1977 Commissioned: 1977 General Characteristics Displacement: 2300 tons surfaced, 3200 tonnes submerged Length: 81.4 metres Beam: 9.5 metres Draught: 7.6 metres Propulsion: OK-155 or BM-40A, 155-MWt Lead cooled fast reactor
40000 shp steam turbine, one shaft Speed: 18-24 knots surfaced, 43-45 knots submerged Depth: 800 m test, 1300 m crush Complement: 27 officers, 4 petty officers Armament: Six 533-mm (21-inch) torpedo tubes:
18 SET-65 or 53-65K torpedoes
20 VA-111 Shkval torpedoes
21 SS-N-15 cruise missiles
12 SS-N-16 cruise missiles
24 mines

1300 meters = 4265 feet (That is deep)

45 knots is damn fast too. that is just barely over 51 MPH. Getting close to torpedo territory.
At that speed it would not trigger additional attention if they had attached a siren to the nose like those StuKas once had.
Plus, the Alfas have all been withdrawn from service. I'm forced to agree with ASWNut101: Seawolf.
__________________
Thor:
Intel Core i7 4770K|ASUS Z87Pro|32GB DDR3 RAM|11GB EVGA GeForce RTX 2080Ti Black|256GB Crucial M4 SSD+2TB WD HDD|4X LG BD-RE|32" Acer Predator Z321QU 165Hz G-Sync (2540x1440)|Logitech Z-323 2.1 Sound|Win 10 Pro

Explorer (MSI GL63 8RE-629 Laptop):
Intel Core i7 8750H|16GB DDR4 RAM|6GB GeForce GTX 1060|128GB SSD+1TB HDD|15.6" Widescreen (1920x1080)|Logitech R-20 2.1 Sound|Win 10 Home
JSLTIGER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-06, 02:37 PM   #10
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
Here are the Alfa specs:

Laid down: 1974 Launched: 1977 Commissioned: 1977 General Characteristics Displacement: 2300 tons surfaced, 3200 tonnes submerged Length: 81.4 metres Beam: 9.5 metres Draught: 7.6 metres Propulsion: OK-155 or BM-40A, 155-MWt Lead cooled fast reactor
40000 shp steam turbine, one shaft Speed: 18-24 knots surfaced, 43-45 knots submerged Depth: 800 m test, 1300 m crush Complement: 27 officers, 4 petty officers Armament: Six 533-mm (21-inch) torpedo tubes:
18 SET-65 or 53-65K torpedoes
20 VA-111 Shkval torpedoes
21 SS-N-15 cruise missiles
12 SS-N-16 cruise missiles
24 mines

1300 meters = 4265 feet (That is deep)

45 knots is damn fast too. that is just barely over 51 MPH. Getting close to torpedo territory.
At that speed it would not trigger additional attention if they had attached a siren to the nose like those StuKas once had.
The Alfa isn't a quiet sub anyway. They created the Mk48 to go to 3000 feet+ just to catch it since I don't think stealth was on the drawingboard when this thing was designed. It was designed to come in, do its business, and then get the heck out of dodge before it could be attacked. at 45 knots, a torp would have a hard time catching it was the idea.

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-06, 03:02 PM   #11
Kapitan
Sub Test Pilot
 
Kapitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK + Canada
Posts: 7,130
Downloads: 77
Uploads: 7


Default

Dont want to spoil the fun here but the al'fa could only dive to 750 meters it was the mike class which was routinely diving beyond 1,100 meters.

The alfa was a interceptor submarine not designed to take on any submarines but to take on small task groups by out diving and out running weapons and ships.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond



Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/

Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/

Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/
Kapitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-06, 03:45 PM   #12
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,637
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
Here are the Alfa specs:

Laid down: 1974 Launched: 1977 Commissioned: 1977 General Characteristics Displacement: 2300 tons surfaced, 3200 tonnes submerged Length: 81.4 metres Beam: 9.5 metres Draught: 7.6 metres Propulsion: OK-155 or BM-40A, 155-MWt Lead cooled fast reactor
40000 shp steam turbine, one shaft Speed: 18-24 knots surfaced, 43-45 knots submerged Depth: 800 m test, 1300 m crush Complement: 27 officers, 4 petty officers Armament: Six 533-mm (21-inch) torpedo tubes:
18 SET-65 or 53-65K torpedoes
20 VA-111 Shkval torpedoes
21 SS-N-15 cruise missiles
12 SS-N-16 cruise missiles
24 mines

1300 meters = 4265 feet (That is deep)

45 knots is damn fast too. that is just barely over 51 MPH. Getting close to torpedo territory.
At that speed it would not trigger additional attention if they had attached a siren to the nose like those StuKas once had.
The Alfa isn't a quiet sub anyway. They created the Mk48 to go to 3000 feet+ just to catch it since I don't think stealth was on the drawingboard when this thing was designed. It was designed to come in, do its business, and then get the heck out of dodge before it could be attacked. at 45 knots, a torp would have a hard time catching it was the idea.

-S
Yes, and while it is racing, it is deaf like my dead grandpa. Such tactics are not my cup of tea. I prefer to be a ghost. And when I think of it, I played almost all sims, even strategy games that way, hell, it's even true for my way of playing chess, in a way. Takes more time, but gives me victory with far lesser losses, usually. One can only hit what one can see.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is online   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-06, 09:17 PM   #13
ASWnut101
Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
Default

Subman, I said deepest diving in the US fleet

And I garentee you that the Seawolf goes ATLEAST 40+ knots. Does the Al'fa have a 20 knot tactical speed, too?

Yes the 212 is good, but its like a kilo:

Uses bateries (you can call them that, i know they are hydrogen motors, like the cars)
problably not very deep diving
slow
not under-ice capeable
short range (dosent even break 10,000 miles, i think)

212 is the modern kilo: good for littorials but poor choice for extended open ocean ops.
__________________

ASWnut101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-06, 05:46 AM   #14
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,637
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ASWnut101
Subman, I said deepest diving in the US fleet

And I garentee you that the Seawolf goes ATLEAST 40+ knots. Does the Al'fa have a 20 knot tactical speed, too?

Yes the 212 is good, but its like a kilo:

Uses bateries (you can call them that, i know they are hydrogen motors, like the cars)
problably not very deep diving
slow
not under-ice capeable
short range (dosent even break 10,000 miles, i think)

212 is the modern kilo: good for littorials but poor choice for extended open ocean ops.
A 212 traveled from Germnany to Rota and back - submerged. Official depth is 400m, assumed crush depth is 700m. Even expert sites vary massively in their opinion on how long it can run submerged, and how far it can reach. That is understandable, for we can safely assume that the German navy keeps this data secret. So when you read this or that value anywhere, take it with a grain of salt. I repeatedly heard, red and saw on TV that the sub at least satys up to 3 weeks underwater. but again - read what I just said before.

In German service and use, the boat is planned as a globally acting intel-platform. Draw your conclusions. even a much smaller Type 206 has travelled into the Carebean some years ago to participate in a local excercise.

I think it is not a bad cjhoice for open water operation assuming it is dueling with another boat, in such a duel duel it would be an exceptionally good choice - for it is quieter than any nuke boat, and open water means there is no terrain around where you can hide (however, of course it can be outrunned by nuclear boats with their higher maximum speeds). Under such combat conditions one would assume: the quieter the better. But since a 212 is not meant to chase after a racing enemy, open water operations are probably not really it's domain. On the other hand: in world war 2 german boats managed to score their hits even on fast moving convoys and warships by appropriate planning and approach.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.

Last edited by Skybird; 10-22-06 at 05:52 AM.
Skybird is online   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-06, 06:22 AM   #15
Linton
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,898
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Skybird the critical piece of information you ommited is how long it took!My guess a ouple of weeks.I am sure they would not run down the English channel submerged.
The most important ting about speed is noise.There is no point being quick if you are noisy and cannot hear anybody else.
The reason the RN went for pumpjets was noise-their missions emphasised noise reduction not speed.
Linton is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.