Tutorial

[Jakobs]

http://www.grupodecombate.com/Jakobs/DW/Test/TMAf.html

[Bellman]

A very professional presentation of good technique.

The TMA challenge was simplified by the presence of two WAA range readings and good active intercept sonar.
Would be nice to see a followup demonstrating ASW and the use of lag beaming in the absence of WAA.

Very nice work though which will help a lot of newcommers, especialy with the manual sonar and Demon demo. Good work.

[UglyMowgli]

Why don't you merge the Towed contact with the Active intercept? you can make your TMA faster, and drop the ambiguity contact sooner.

[SeaQueen]

Originally Posted by MSgalileo

Why don't you merge the Towed contact with the Active intercept? you can make your TMA faster, and drop the ambiguity contact sooner.

Yeah really... the FIRST concern I'd have had then was the pinging. LOTS of ships show up on passive sonar. Only shooty ones show up on active intercept.

[Jakobs]

Originally Posted by MSgalileo

Why don't you merge the Towed contact with the Active intercept? you can make your TMA faster, and drop the ambiguity contact sooner.

Yes, you are right.

The original post explain this point, source: http://subclub.info/phpBB_subclub/viewtopic.php?t=18156

Originally Posted by Jakobs at Sub Club

03:07 Pantalla de navegación. Es fácil determinar qué contacto es el verdadero y cuál el falso, dado que, mientras uno lo hemos captado con la towed array, el otro ha sido captado con la towed array y con el sonar de intercepción activa. No obstante, se determinará qué contacto es el falso si no supiéramos que es el único contacto por la zona, y no hubiera estado dando pings continuos.

Translation: 03:07 Nav Map. It's easy to determine what contact is the true and which the false one, since, while one is detected by towed array, the other one has been detected by towed array and sonar active intercept...

Thanks for your comments!!