![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Helmsman
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 102
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Hello all. I was just wondering if anyone else has a problem seeing contacts on the Kilo's radar station? On the other subs. The Seawolf and 688 they are fine. Or is it just me?
__________________
-Kirk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,320
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The Kilo sonar is not on the par with american/soviet akula sonars.
So don't expect the same kind of long range performance. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United States, CA
Posts: 195
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
He's talking about radar, not sonar. Maybe they just invested in cheap quality radar systems for the kilo.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Helmsman
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 102
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
OK. I was also asking about how "bright" the contact is? If you look at the 688I and Seawolf's radar and if there is a contact it is bright enough to see. However with the Kilo's you have to turn off your lights in your room to see it. I had a contact in truth showing around 10 miles away but radar could not see it and if it was there, I could hardly see it with my eyes on the radar screen. Cool about what you did say earlier. I do like some submarine history. Cya. -Kirk
__________________
-Kirk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|