![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
XO
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado, for now. Any RED State, ASAP.
Posts: 401
Downloads: 77
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
(GWX3) An old 4 stack British destroyer "pinging" me with ASDIC in September, 1939????
As dementia Joe would say.... "C'Mon Man" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
"Realistic" is not always GAME-GOOD." - Wave Skipper ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Weps
![]() |
![]()
I suspect that the issue is the 4-Stacker, which did not enter RN service until after the Destroyer for Bases deal in 1940. If this is the case, then the presence of a 4-Stacker escort in the simulation where none could be in real life is an intolerable, game-breaking bug.
All modders and developers responsible for this egregious abuse of history should be shot at dawn and SH4 GWX3 must be removed from every computer in the world with immediate effect. This horrific Crime Against Realism must be stamped out of existence as it is an offence to rivet-counters everywhere. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
"Realistic" is not always GAME-GOOD." - Wave Skipper ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Weps
![]() |
![]()
True, but then there would be one less thing to whine about. At least I got to use 'egregious' in a sentence!
-C |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
__________________
"Realistic" is not always GAME-GOOD." - Wave Skipper ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
CTD - it's not just a job
|
![]()
__________________
"...and bollocks to the naysayers" - Jimbuna |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|