The 9th Circus got one right!!!

[Takeda Shingen]

Regardless of whatever Anthony's political views are, he stated them in a way that was not insulting to any member of this forum. He does not deserve to be treated in this manner.

The only child I see in this thread is you, Tribesman. You are, in my opinion, no better than waste_gate/Castle Bravo/spooka2/The Third Man. Shame on you.

That might be hard, seeing that Tribesman never actually says anything about himself.

Your memory must be slipping Steve

Regardless of whatever Anthony's political views are

It has nothing whatsoever to do with any political views he may or may not hold.

He does not deserve to be treated in this manner.

How should a seemingly compulsive liar be treated?

[mookiemookie]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

How should a seemingly compulsive liar be treated?

Is it worth it, though? You're a smart guy and you make good points, but people will focus on the negativity and use it against you. Don't let them. Pick your battles.

Is it worth it, though?

It is the one thing I really cannot abide.

You're a smart guy and you make good points

No on the first and don't tell Steve on the second

Pick your battles.

I did, like I said the ruling was correct.
It then developed when the right of a racist idiot to call for the murder of a president because apparently "******s" are worthless scum being protected morphed into "the president should listen to the people".....not the greatest direction especially given the widely held perception of some parts of the tea party and of course the problems with Giffords shooting and Palins awkward rhetoric over taking aim at politicians you don't like.

Since A/W with his record of truthfullness managed to respond to a post yet not address a single issue in it while still writing "fact" ..."fact"... "fact" it just opened the field up

[Anthony W.]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

It is the one thing I really cannot abide.


No on the first and don't tell Steve on the second


I did, like I said the ruling was correct.
It then developed when the right of a racist idiot to call for the murder of a president because apparently "******s" are worthless scum being protected morphed into "the president should listen to the people".....not the greatest direction especially given the widely held perception of some parts of the tea party and of course the problems with Giffords shooting and Palins awkward rhetoric over taking aim at politicians you don't like.

Since A/W with his record of truthfullness managed to respond to a post yet not address a single issue in it while still writing "fact" ..."fact"... "fact" it just opened the field up

Here's my question - why - just because the president is black - do you immediately jump to the accusation of racism?

To be 100% honest, I know a guy that said Obama is better off assassinated (I don't agree). He (the guy) isn't racist in the least bit.

[razark]

Originally Posted by Anthony W.

Here's my question - why - just because the president is black - do you immediately jump to the accusation of racism?

From the article in the first post:
"A La Mesa man who posted racial epithets and a call to "shoot" Barack Obama on an Internet chat site..."

Originally Posted by Anthony W.

To be 100% honest, I know a guy that said Obama is better off assassinated (I don't agree). He (the guy) isn't racist in the least bit.

"...a call to 'shoot the [racist slur]'"

I think that may be why racism was brought up.

[Anthony W.]

Originally Posted by razark

From the article in the first post:
"A La Mesa man who posted racial epithets and a call to "shoot" Barack Obama on an Internet chat site..."


"...a call to 'shoot the [racist slur]'"

I think that may be why racism was brought up.

Ohhh, okay, I need to do more than skim these articles.

But I do want to point out that not all the calls are for racial reasons.

Here's my question - why - just because the president is black - do you immediately jump to the accusation of racism?

In my posts did I take the words "******" or "sambo" from thin air or are they in the document linked in the OP? How about "shooting up cars of ******s" where does that come from?

Ohhh, okay, I need to do more than skim these articles.

It might help.

[Anthony W.]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

It might help.

Well, reading 3 articles and talking to a history professor all at once stretches my ability to multitask