![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#16 |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 97
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
When we're speaking about long range shots, the larger target presented by the 90 AOB attack outweighs any advantages of magnetic pistols, in my opinion. This is especially true as magnetics are prone to prematurely detonate, and a longer run increases this risk considerably.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||
Lucky Sailor
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rome
Posts: 4,273
Downloads: 81
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I disagree.... but..... you know..... Quote:
I believe magnetics inflict more damage than impacts due to the area the 'hit'. They rarely predetonate in calm seas, and since this is a long rage sniper thread, I highly doubt the conditions we're talking about will be that bad. A magnetic shot under these circumstances is almost a must IMO, as the margin for error is so small, that you're going to want that extra few meters of target area the magnetics provide. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 97
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
90 degree impact shots always have a larger target area to hit than magnetic shots at AOB < 60 or > 120. A 100 meter long ship appears to be only 86 meters long if AOB is 60, 70 meters long if AOB is 45 and 50 meters long if AOB is 30. At 90 AOB you have the whole 100 meters to hit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Lucky Sailor
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rome
Posts: 4,273
Downloads: 81
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I won't deny your math, or the fact that end on shots require magnetics, but I am in the camp that says Broadside shots can use magnetics also. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 97
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Lucky Sailor
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rome
Posts: 4,273
Downloads: 81
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
At these ranges, I'll take anything I can get. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In the mountains, now. On the edge of the sea before.
Posts: 933
Downloads: 47
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Lab work necessary!
__________________
"Well, now, that's true... the IXC is a bit of a chick magnet..but you really can't beat the VIIB for off-road fun." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: AN9771
Posts: 4,904
Downloads: 304
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Assuming the speed is a rounded value may work, but isn't realistic to expect.
__________________
My site downloads: https://ricojansen.nl/downloads |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 97
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Of course, there is still the problem of measuring the speed and AoB accurately enough from that distance. The fixed wire method will give accurate enough speed, but AoB pretty much requires plotting, unless it's a convoy. With convoys you can get accurate AoB easily by maneuvering either exactly in front or behind a column or to the side of a row, because the columns lie exactly on the convoy course and the rows are exactly perpendicular to the course. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: AN9771
Posts: 4,904
Downloads: 304
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
My site downloads: https://ricojansen.nl/downloads |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 97
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Exactly the reason why I'd never attempt a 14 km shot. 6 km is already pushing it a bit further than I'd like, even with a perfect solution.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|