I'm not sure I ever made an introduction yet.

Originally Posted by antikristuseke

I'm not sure what you are trying to tell me with that, but nevermind.

On to the point, there are several reasons why I have a severely violent reaction towards pedophilia (lets not start nit picking about the exact term here). I will not be sharing those here, sufices to say some people close to me have been affected by it. I find it quite difficult to stay reasonable when it comes to this topic.

Something along the lines of this:

[onelifecrisis]

Originally Posted by Platapus

That reminds me of a conversation The Frau and I had with her daughter who was in highschool at the time.

Every year, in Virginia, the topic of school uniforms comes up. Her daughter was absolutely against it. Wearing a uniform would stifle her individuality.

I told her that she currently wears a school uniform.

"No I don't!!"

Yes, you do. You wear exactly what your peer group wears and nothing else. The colour, style and brand name must match what all your friends wear. When you peer group changes how they dress, you follow theirs lead and change also. Where is the individuality when you wear only what your peer group wants you to wear?

She then tried to explain that they are all acting as individuals.... together.

lol

Reminds me of a comedy sketch I saw.

Interviewer: What does that tattoo on your neck say?
Boy: It says "INDIVIDUAL"
Interviewer: And why did you get that tattoo?
Boy: All my mates had one.

[Oberon]

Originally Posted by onelifecrisis

lol

Reminds me of a comedy sketch I saw.

Interviewer: What does that tattoo on your neck say?
Boy: It says "INDIVIDUAL"
Interviewer: And why did you get that tattoo?
Boy: All my mates had one.

School uniforms do kill individuality. And it's not like there's just one group, there's preps, emos, jocks, cheerleaders, geeks, band, scene, stoners, and other groups all separate. Then there are the rebels who just wear and do whatever they want.

Argue it however you like.
If it was MY daughter?
They'd never find the body.

Originally Posted by privateer

Argue it however you like.
If it was MY daughter?
They'd never find the body.

How old is your daughter?

[onelifecrisis]

Someone ban this guy already.

Originally Posted by onelifecrisis

Someone ban this guy already.

Why would the admins ban me?

[Takeda Shingen]

Hmm. No, a few hours ago you hadn't made an introduction. Since then, you have proceeded to vaugely endorse illegal activity, insult the membership and complain about the site's fundraising drive.

I suppose that some introductions are best not made.

EDIT: Some light reading, should you intend to be around for longer than a few weeks: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/faq....ules3_faq_item

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

Hmm. No, a few hours ago you hadn't made an introduction. Since then, you have proceeded to vaugely endorse illegal activity, insult the membership and complain about the site's fundraising drive.

I suppose that some introductions are best not made.

EDIT: Some light reading, should you intend to be around for longer than a few weeks: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/faq....ules3_faq_item

I didn't endorse any illegal activity.

[Takeda Shingen]

Originally Posted by Solace

I didn't endorse any illegal activity.

Debatable. I don't think that you'd find many that would back you in that assertion. The best guideline is that if it seems like it might be too close to the line, it probably is. I believe that you've crossed a line in this thread.

[Bort]

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

Debatable. I don't think that you'd find many that would back you in that assertion. The best guideline is that if it seems like it might be too close to the line, it probably is. I believe that you've crossed a line in this thread.

I never once mentioned sex with minors in a favorable light.

[Takeda Shingen]

Originally Posted by Solace

I never once mentioned sex with minors in a favorable light.

Not explicitly, but clearly implied.

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

Not explicitly, but clearly implied.

I went out of my way to say "non-sexual relationship"