*facepalm* I thought it was going to be all female crews on subs!!!

[Safe-Keeper]

Didn't they use the same arguments they do now when they debated whether or not coloured people should be allowed to serve with white people? "Can't be done, we've got wars to fight, and our troops are too racist to have Negroes among them!".

If Norway, Australia, Spain and Canada can do it so can we.

/thread.

Since there are no female submariners right now, the crew MUST be mixed unless you want a hastily formed crew with no sub operating experience being thrown into a crash course and then placed on the sub.

Cough, Down Periscope, cough.

[Safe-Keeper]

TOP THREATS TO US NUCLEAR SUBMARINES

Girls on board
.
.
.
Bernard
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
End of the world
.
.
Massive undersea volcano eruption directly under sub
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Other submarines with torpedoes
.
Mines
.
.
Depth charges
.
.
.
Hitting the bottom accidentally
.
.
.
.
.
.
Polar bears

[Turbografx]

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike

If Norway, Australia, Spain and Canada can do it so can we.

Don't forget Sweden and Denmark.

[Dowly]

I came here to look for boobies.. wankers.

[krashkart]

Originally Posted by TarJak

Mind you we are both talking about skimmers and wingnuts. Of course submariners would never do anything like that.

Of course not.



Maybe what the Navy should do is commission an all-female attack sub. Nobody in their right mind would mess with a Seawolf crewed by bitchy women that have been underwater, in cramped quarters and away from their families for months on end, would they?

[Admiral8Q]

Originally Posted by SteamWake

The men and women of the armed forces are supposed to be professionals and conduct themselves in such a manner.

It he/she cant keep it in their pants they should be summarily dismissed.

I would also be willing to bet that the vast majority of them are married.

Now that I said that it is inevitable that someone will drop their moral standards and 'fool around'.

Best intentions and all that.

Well said. I agree 100% on that.

[ETR3(SS)]

Originally Posted by SteamWake

The men and women of the armed forces are supposed to be professionals and conduct themselves in such a manner.

Supposed to be and are, are two different things.

It he/she cant keep it in their pants they should be summarliy dismissed.

I completely agree. It takes two to tango and both parties should be held responsible.

I would also be willing to bet that the vast majority of them are married.

That would be an incorrect assumption. The submarine force has one of the highest divorces ratings in all the services. This is due to the long times spent away from home with none or very little two-way communication. Add women into the mix and that already high divorce rate will skyrocket.

Now that I said that it is enevitable that someone will drop their moral standards and 'fool around'.

Nothing new really. Happens in the rest of the military all the time.

And to our European subsimers, your culture when it comes to sex is completely opposite of ours. We were founded on a Puritan lifestyle that persists to this day.

[SteamWake]

Originally Posted by ETR3(SS)

Supposed to be and are, are two different things..

I would beg to differ. The vast majority of our enlisted men and women are indeed professionals.

[ETR3(SS)]

Originally Posted by SteamWake

I would beg to differ. The vast majority of our enlisted men and women are indeed professionals.

The way we act around the general public and the way we act "behind closed doors" are indeed night and day.