SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-06-10, 09:49 PM   #1
ERPP8
Commodore
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: My House
Posts: 608
Downloads: 161
Uploads: 0
Default Ship Identification

Can someone tell me what kind of ship is in this movie?
ERPP8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-10, 10:26 PM   #2
Torplexed
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
 
Torplexed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,823
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0


Default

If you are speaking of the destroyer, the German destroyer in the movie was named Z-49. The 'real' Z-49 was authorized in 1942 and laid down in 1943. Damaged by Allied bombing, she was never completed and was broken up on the stocks.

The Z-49 as in the movie U-571 was portrayed by an ex-USN ARS rescue and salvage ship built during WWII. She is most likely still operational in the Turkish Navy.


Torplexed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-10, 11:36 AM   #3
ERPP8
Commodore
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: My House
Posts: 608
Downloads: 161
Uploads: 0
Default

How could it still be in operation if it was blown up at the end?
ERPP8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-10, 11:42 AM   #4
Torplexed
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
 
Torplexed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,823
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ERPP8 View Post
How could it still be in operation if it was blown up at the end?
I'm fairly certain from the look of that explosion that it was CGI. Much cheaper than buying a ship and blowing it up.
Torplexed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-10, 11:44 AM   #5
ETR3(SS)
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Between test depth and periscope depth
Posts: 3,021
Downloads: 175
Uploads: 16
Default

Special Effects.
__________________


USS Kentucky SSBN 737 (G)
Comms Div 2003-2006
Qualified 19 November 03

Yes I was really on a submarine.
ETR3(SS) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-10, 11:47 AM   #6
ERPP8
Commodore
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: My House
Posts: 608
Downloads: 161
Uploads: 0
Default

The effects are too good to be CGI

Besides they had the money to build a real U-Boat, not buy it.
ERPP8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-10, 11:52 AM   #7
Raptor1
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ERPP8 View Post
The effects are too good to be CGI
As a person who both messed with CGI and has seen it's effects from people who actually know what they're doing, I'll have to disagree with you.
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory
Raptor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-10, 11:53 AM   #8
ERPP8
Commodore
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: My House
Posts: 608
Downloads: 161
Uploads: 0
Default

The ships don's match either, I found it to be a 1936B destroyer.
ERPP8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-10, 11:55 AM   #9
Raptor1
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ERPP8 View Post
The ships don's match either, I found it to be a 1936B destroyer.
The real one (Which, again, was never completed), not the one in the movie as none of these exist today (Or have existed when it was filmed).

EDIT: Whoops, that's not even right since she was supposed to be of the unbuilt 1936C class.
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory
Raptor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-10, 12:03 PM   #10
Torplexed
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
 
Torplexed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,823
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor1 View Post
The real one (Which, again, was never completed), not the one in the movie as none of these exist today (Or have existed when it was filmed).

EDIT: Whoops, that's not even right since she was supposed to be of the unbuilt 1936C class.
Exactly. If you compare photos or drawings the ship in the movie hardly resembles any WW2 era German destroyer built or unbuilt. The lines are all wrong.
Torplexed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-10, 12:40 PM   #11
Dowly
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 25,052
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ERPP8 View Post
The effects are too good to be CGI

Besides they had the money to build a real U-Boat, not buy it.
I think you are underestimating what can be done with CGI.

Here's one example what an "average Joe" can do today:


Tho, I'm pretty sure that in this case, the explosion is real. In *shivers* Pearl Harbor, some of the explosions were done by laying out charges on the decks of the ships, but naturally they werent destructive charges, just something to give a fireball. Also, IIRC, from behind the scenes, they had the charges on scaffolding or soemthing like that to keep the actualy contact of the explosion to minimum with the ship's deck.
Dowly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-10, 12:46 PM   #12
ERPP8
Commodore
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: My House
Posts: 608
Downloads: 161
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly View Post
I think you are underestimating what can be done with CGI.
The biggest problem with modern CGI technology is the generated textures, they look too smooth, not random like real life.
ERPP8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-10, 12:52 PM   #13
Dowly
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 25,052
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ERPP8 View Post
The biggest problem with modern CGI technology is the generated textures, they look too smooth, not random like real life.
Randomness can be adjusted by the artist easily. Especially with FumeFX, given you have a biiiig render farm, you can put the resolution very high and you get a very random explosion with lots of small details and stuff, resulting to a very real looking explosion/smoke/fire.
Dowly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-10, 12:57 PM   #14
ERPP8
Commodore
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: My House
Posts: 608
Downloads: 161
Uploads: 0
Default

There will always be a gap between real and CGI though and we will be able to tell the difference.
Another thing is frame rate.
CGI will have a high frame rate and actual filming of explosions is more limited.
ERPP8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-10, 12:59 PM   #15
Raptor1
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Saying 'always' is not a very good proposition...
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory
Raptor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.