Type VIIC tower...

TH0R · 02-02-10, 03:41 PM

I know it may not be the biggest concern SubSim members are discussing nowdays, but still - it looks like they (again) didn't model VIIC tower correctly. I one of the previous posts (when people were still discussing the game and not the OSP/DRM) I posted that there is something wrong with the tower, but couldn't get my finger on it. Then I saw this post today, over at UBI SH5 forum...

SeeWolfU-571 has explained it nicely in this thread.

At least they got the darn deck railing correct this time (I hope).

HundertzehnGustav · 02-02-10, 04:16 PM

hold on was that not discussed here too? same pictures...

The General · 02-02-10, 04:29 PM

I just hope they include visible damage to the Conning Tower this time. In all previous incarnations, the conning tower was indestuctible, atleast visually. It never had a scratch, despite holes the size of small cars being blown in the side of the hull.

TH0R · 02-02-10, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HundertzehnGustav

hold on was that not discussed here too? same pictures...

If it was I didn't see it. And I have been visiting these forums lately every day.

JScones · 02-03-10, 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HundertzehnGustav

hold on was that not discussed here too? same pictures...

T'was.

Nickolas · 02-03-10, 01:45 AM

it would be nice to see a correctly modeled tower in the game (also, it lacks the bended thingy that suposedly shields the crew from the wind).

but to be honest there are more pressing matters at hand.

quad5 · 02-03-10, 03:22 AM

TH0R, thank you for attention to this problem!

02-02-10, 03:41 PM	#1
TH0R XO Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Croatia Posts: 420 Downloads: 52 Uploads: 0	Type VIIC tower... I know it may not be the biggest concern SubSim members are discussing nowdays, but still - it looks like they (again) didn't model VIIC tower correctly. I one of the previous posts (when people were still discussing the game and not the OSP/DRM) I posted that there is something wrong with the tower, but couldn't get my finger on it. Then I saw this post today, over at UBI SH5 forum... *SeeWolfU-571* has explained it nicely in this thread. At least they got the darn deck railing correct this time (I hope).

02-02-10, 04:16 PM	#2
HundertzehnGustav Sea Lord Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Lux, betw. G, B and F Posts: 1,898 Downloads: 66 Uploads: 0	hold on was that not discussed here too? same pictures... __________________ In conclusion: SH3 is the shizzle, yo. -Frau Kaleun Another negative about using your deck gun is that you are definately DETECTED, which has long term effects on your relationship with aircraft. -snestorm

02-02-10, 04:29 PM	#3
The General The Old Man Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Mountain Ash, Wales, U.K. Posts: 1,548 Downloads: 179 Uploads: 3	I just hope they include visible damage to the Conning Tower this time. In all previous incarnations, the conning tower was indestuctible, atleast visually. It never had a scratch, despite holes the size of small cars being blown in the side of the hull. __________________ *THE GENERAL*

02-03-10, 03:22 AM	#7
quad5 Soundman Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Russia Posts: 147 Downloads: 581 Uploads: 0	TH0R, thank you for attention to this problem! __________________ http://hosted.filefront.com/Unterseeboote/ Last edited by quad5; 02-03-10 at 04:25 AM.

02-03-10, 01:45 AM	#6
Nickolas Torpedoman Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina Posts: 112 Downloads: 17 Uploads: 0	it would be nice to see a correctly modeled tower in the game (also, it lacks the bended thingy that suposedly shields the crew from the wind). but to be honest there are more pressing matters at hand.