![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Weps
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Control Room
Posts: 355
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I run with 100% realism setting and play DiD. With Type IXs, it seems D is VERY DEAD.
I've started 4 careers in IXC and IXC/40 boats. (Call them 'L', 'M', 'N' and 'W'. Three have been sunk (L, M and W). All three were sunk by aircraft. Two of these (M and W) were on their first patrol. These two were sunk on their second and first air attack, respectively. The other victim (L) was on its fifth patrol and had undergone 22 air attacks on its final patrol, as well as five other aircraft sightings that did not result in an attack. The surviving boat (N) was severely damaged by aircraft on its most recent patrol and just barely managed to limp back to port. M was sunk in late '42, L and W in March '43, and N was damaged in late February '43. I'm not careless with my IX boats. I had two careers in IXBs with a total of 20 war patrols. Both Kaleuns retired unscathed. (One was my top ace with nearly 400kT sunk). My IXCs are spending 80%-90% of the time submerged. They come up only at night to recharge batteries and load externally stored torpedoes. In calm to moderate seas they run with decks awash to reduce dive time. The watch crews are rotated regularly to ensure that they are alert. They all have radar warning detectors and the most up-to-date batteries. When submerged I generally run at an average of 3 knots to conserve battery life and reduce recharging time. Once the allies expand their air coverage, the slower dive times and longer battery recharge times seem to make type IXs more vulnerable to air attack than type VIIs. Their longer patrol routes expose them to more days subject to air patrols. (The 27 encounters that L had with aircraft on its last patrol all occurred before the boat even reached its designated patrol area off the Bahamas.) Do any experienced Type IX Kaleuns have any suggestions about how to survive in a Type IX during the first half of '43? (I'm not interested in exploits like: "run at TC 1024 to reduce detection by aircraft.") When schnorkels become available, do they help?
__________________
100% realism, DiD Harbor Traffic 1.47(incl. RUB) Using SH3 Commander to implement many custom realism tweaks Covered 1939-1945; now restarting in 1939 again. Completed 39 careers, 210 war patrols, 4.7Mt sunk, 19 subs lost |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Deep in the Wild Canadian suburbs.
Posts: 1,468
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Schnorkels are still pretty obvious, though they do extend your time under considerably, hydrophones don't go up to the air, and using them in broad daylight is basically sending out a flare for flyers, only blind. You can still survive, with a good RADAR detector, and quick reflexes, but don't expect it.
__________________
![]() The entire German garrison of Vanviken, right here in your thread! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Machinist's Mate
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Merry Old England
Posts: 121
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I thought air attacks were pretty much turned off if you went above 256?
What TC is the best compromise between getting some good encounters with aircraft but without being at such a low compression that it takes days to finish a patrol? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ...somewhere in the swamps of Jersey.
Posts: 910
Downloads: 157
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Wow. With work and family it normally takes me a week! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
I have survived into late 44 with a IXD-2 by charging batteries 4 times a day. This reduces the time required to charge to about 1 hour at a time. This seems to reduce my chances of being detected alot. It also means that if I am detected and have to dive, I still have enough battery power left to stay under awhile.
__________________
"Some ships are designed to sink...others require our assistance." Nathan Zelk ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: BA 72
Posts: 1,092
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The beauty of the schnorkel is that you are already at PD, so if you detect radar signals, it's no big deal to get down to a safe 50m.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Weps
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Control Room
Posts: 355
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I presume that at least one of the four times is during daylight hours. I wonder why this approach reduces the chance of being detected. You are still surfaced 4 hours out of every 24, but now at least one of those hours is during daylight. I hadn't tried this approach because it seemed to me to increase the chance of being spotted. Does anybody know if the game engine works in such a way that being surfaced for one two hour recharge makes you more likely to be spotted by aircraft than being surfaced for two separate one hour recharges? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Weps
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Control Room
Posts: 355
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
What I do is a bit different. Both my time surfaced and the TC I run at depend on whether I am in an area with enemy air coverage. In an area with enemy air coverage, I spend at least 20 hours submerged. I never run on the surface with a TC greater than 32, but I spend 12 hours of my submerged time running at TC 1024. Most of the rest of the sumerged time is at TC 32. This approach doesn't avoid many aircraft encounters, but does reduce the number of hydrophone contacts I make. I consider this a good outcome because there seems to be too many merchant ships in the game. This approach means a game day takes a little less than half an hour real time. In an area with no enemy air coverage, I spend most of my time on the surface. I dive for periodic hydrophone checks. If I am just travelling to or from a patol area, my surfaced travel is at TC 1024. In a patrol area, I don't exceed TC 32. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,893
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The best advice really I can offer is, try to cruise at at least 9 knots. Also, it pays to have a maxed out flakcrew because chances are you are going to need them
the big trick... use the 16km atmosphere. (if you aren't) I think really that sometimes with the IX, depending on the plane, it pays to stay up on the surface, run at flank speed, and blast away at the incoming plane till it flies over you, then crash dive! Some planes are on you before you can get under. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Weps
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 359
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I consider myself pretty good with IXC, my biggest enemy is the Hedgehog (usually after a convoy attack), not airplanes. I spend just enough time on the surface to recharge, not a second more. the snorkel is useful only to recharge in bad weather. Having your snorkel out in good visibility is a invitation to air attacks. Don't forget to get radar warning ASAP. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||||
Weps
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Control Room
Posts: 355
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||||
Weps
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Control Room
Posts: 355
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I had one skipper who used to stay up and fight it out with planes. After losing a few flak crews and taking severe damage, he changed his mind. Quote:
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,893
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Well you can tell by the engine noise, if the engine noise is high pitched its fast and its going to be on you before you can Crashdive..... If the engine noise is low pitched then you have a chance to get under... low pitched noise = something big with plenty of bombs.
The beauty about the 16k atmosphere is you get more time to respond.... if you run at the standard 8 then you only get the full 8km visibility if the weather is perfect. So say the conditions are Clouds, partial. Wind, 2m/s. Rain, none. Visibility, unlimited. With the 8km you will see for just under 8km with the 16k mod those condition will give your watch crew visibility to well over 15km away. Which makes a big difference.... Lets say the conditions are clouds, partial. Wind, 2 m/s. Rain, none. Visibility, moderate. You are running 8k... the farthest with that your crew will be able to see is about 5km... which means the plane will be on top of you before you can blink. Now what I suggested earlier... Id on't mean stay up till the plane is shot down. I mean, man your flak guns, get them all firing at medium range targeting any plane... the plane will dive on you, as its diving on you, you are launching up a hail of bullets at it, that will make its accuracy wobble a little bit... once it flies over you, it then has to fly off turn round and come back... this is your chance! Crashdive here! Before you take any more damage. IX's are slow Crashdivers... but... with the 16k mod, they might just about get under in time. At least... thats my experiences both from gameplay and testing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 78
Downloads: 44
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Once allied air cover becomes a problem I run full or flank diesels on the surface when I'm doing battery charging runs so that when the plane does appear, and it will if your cruising across the Biscay, I have a fairly decent chance at crash diving and getting deep enough so that the bombs do minimal damage.
As for the radar detectors, I don't put much stock in those, and I prefer to do batter charge runs during the extremely early morning hours or late at night so my watch crew gets the benefit of some twilight to see incoming enemy planes as soon as the radar detector picks them up, so that I can get a fast start on a crash dive. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
Weps
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Control Room
Posts: 355
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
For me the question is whether my computer can handle the 16k mod. I think I have the processor and RAM (P4 2.8GHz, 3GB), but my graphics card is a lowly ATI RADEON 9600 with only 128MB. Anbyody know whether this can handle the 16k atmosphere mod? Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|