SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-24-21, 11:33 AM   #1
Arlo
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,304
Downloads: 214
Uploads: 0
Default Is Apollo 11's Lunar Module Still In Orbit Around The Moon 52 Years Later?

__________________
-Arlo
Arlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-21, 12:22 PM   #2
Aktungbby
Gefallen Engel U-666
 
Aktungbby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: On a tilted, overheated, overpopulated spinning mudball on Collision course with Andromeda Galaxy
Posts: 30,074
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0


Default

NOPE!
__________________

"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness?!!
Aktungbby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-21, 07:52 AM   #3
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,399
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Just to clarify, the LEM consisted of two parts. The decent module (four legged thing) and the ascent module (very small cramped thing).


When the Apollo 11 ascent module was jettisoned after the two astronauts transferred to the CSM, it was just jettisoned. Unlike the other Apollo ascent modules, which were used for impact studies, the Apollo 11 ascent module was just jettisoned to move it away from the CSM so the CSM could safely conduct its maneuvers.

It was assumed that the ascent module was in an unstable orbit and would naturally decay and crash. Where and when, we really did not care too much about.

The issue is the Mass Concentrations (MASCONS) of the moon are irregular. It IS possible that the ascent module was incidentally placed in a stable orbit or whether the mascons allowed it to drift into a more stable orbit.
We don't know.
So why has no one at NASA bothered to look for it? Simply because they don't have the time, nor the authorization to expend the resources to look for it. It would take a lot of time and resources to find something as small (both size and RCS) as the ascent module. NASA has done this before by finding a "lost' Indian lunar orbiter, but the Indian space agencies paid NASA to find it...... no one is willing to pay NASA to find the Apollo 11 ascent module.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.

Last edited by Platapus; 09-28-21 at 05:20 PM. Reason: Well, at least I was consistent with my spelling errors
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-21, 01:14 AM   #4
tmccarthy
Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,302
Downloads: 270
Uploads: 16
Default

That would be incredible. I hope it's still there.

I thought it was cool enough that in future generations kids will be able to go on school field trips and visit the Apollo 11 landing site and see Neil & Buzz's footprints.
__________________
tmccarthy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-21, 06:29 AM   #5
THE_MASK
Ace of the deep .
 
THE_MASK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,226
Downloads: 901
Uploads: 73


Default

If i was told in 1972 that man would not go to the moon in over 50 years i wouldnt have believed them .
THE_MASK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-21, 08:49 AM   #6
Rockstar
In the Brig
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Zendia Bar & Grill
Posts: 12,614
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Why expend time and money to look for something that was never there? It’s been proven by science many times over the moon landing was fake.
Rockstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.