SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-16-20, 07:16 PM   #1
jorgegonzalito
Officer
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Posts: 237
Downloads: 322
Uploads: 0
Default 50 feet under the keel? No way!

In a simple GWX mission, a convoy is ordered to attack the coastal area of Charleston, USA. The mission begins - as usual - with the convoy about ten miles or less from the U-boat. We are in shallow water and the depth below the keel is just 50 feet! Am I exaggerating or is it a suicide attack, more typical of Japanese fanaticism than of the thinking brain of a German? With that depth at the time the submarine is detected by the planes and escort ships, it will be doomed and with it all its crew, because it will not be able to dive deep nor can it escape submerged with the poor speed that its electric motors give it. Wouldn't it be more sensible to wait for the convoy in deeper water and attack it, if there is a way to know what the usual routes they use?
In the avatar I appear as a doctor of the red cross, but I am not a conscientious objector, if I have to fight I do it fiercely, but I always risk if I see I have a chance of winning. Otherwise I would be foolish, it is not only my life that I put at risk, don't you think?
jorgegonzalito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-20, 07:32 PM   #2
bstanko6
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Murwik Naval Academy
Posts: 2,130
Downloads: 390
Uploads: 13


Default

It is commanders discretion. But yes, I would wait for deeper waters.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
BSTANKO6'S SH5 NAVAL ACADEMY
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPbe...W2NArCA/videos

DISCORD
https://discord.gg/6tFeTSUmVc
bstanko6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-20, 05:41 AM   #3
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,645
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

BE MORE AGGRESSIVE!!
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-20, 09:55 AM   #4
Randomizer
Weps
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 366
Downloads: 138
Uploads: 0


Default

What Jimbuna says.

You really should read up about some Drumbeat patrols and the Inshore Campaign of 1944-45. Of course in the latter, casualties were heavy and successes few but shallow water ops were definitely ordered by BdU and executed by aggressive commanders when opportunity arose.

-C
Randomizer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-20, 03:54 PM   #5
jorgegonzalito
Officer
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Posts: 237
Downloads: 322
Uploads: 0
Default yes Randomizer but....

A submarine commander is not Mandrake, and Doenitz had no trouble giving those orders, since the only thing that could happen to him is to cut himself while shaving in the morning.
jorgegonzalito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-20, 04:56 PM   #6
Randomizer
Weps
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 366
Downloads: 138
Uploads: 0


Default

I have no idea who or what a Mandrake is but it seems clear that you don't seem to be having very much fun with SH3.

Or for that matter understanding how subordinates do not get to select which orders to follow and which to just say "No thanks, I'll sit this one out." You can do so in the game but then you brought up real life with:

Quote:
Doenitz had no trouble giving those orders, since the only thing that could happen to him is to cut himself while shaving in the morning
Doenitz did his time as a U-Boat commander, as a torpedo boat flotilla leader, a cruiser captain and then as BdU. Presumably he followed orders as best he could and expected his subordinates to do the same. Invoking his distance from the front in a game context is actually a pretty disingenuous and even dishonest unless it's applied equally to practically every senior commander in the 20th Century. Doing that will just display a massive ignorance of how military's function in the real world.

While I am not a fan of Doenitz for a variety of reasons, implying that he was indifferent is just plain garbage unsupported by any evidence.

We get it, you don't like the game, you don't like shallow water ops (who does but sometimes they're necessary), you don't like the fatigue model (use SH3 Commander and turn it off) and you have no idea how a naval command hierarchy actually works.

-C
Randomizer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.