![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 72
Downloads: 26
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I quite like the torpedo evasion mechanics in this game. Yes the sub agility and knuckles are total BS, as are the way the torpedoes helpfully turn away when they lose lock but as a game, it feels pretty good. I still get hit by torpedoes and usually it's because I screwed up somehow which makes for good gameplay.
But man does it freak the crap out of me for how it would work in real life. Any ex (or current!) submariners on here? Did you ever feel that if things went hot you were basically screwed? I know that stealth would be a FAR greater factor than it's modelled here but it feels like if it ever got to the stage where someone is able to launch a weapon at you... your chances weren't great. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: AZ & DC
Posts: 487
Downloads: 48
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Angles and dangles. I think a lot of the submarine budget goes to stealthiness.
I had read on the internet, and EVERYTHING on the internet is true of course, that there is an ability to shut down among large schools of fish to mask sound. In CW, if I sink a ship/sub and it is creaking away on the bottom I go to it in hopes of masking my presence in its noise. I sit 30ft above it hoping that it masks me. I wonder if that is modelled in CW. I still do it, though. If anyone knows about the modelling in this case, an intel report would be appreciated. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 187
Downloads: 20
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Haha this guy's gotta be a fellow hockey player. Sometimes after a nice evasion on a torp I'll catch myself saying "dirty ****ing dangles, boys."
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 395
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 1
|
![]()
"Its a hard life picking stones and pulling teats, but sure as God's got sandals it beats fighting dudes with treasure trails."
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 187
Downloads: 20
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Clappies from the hashies buddy!
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Planesman
![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Bosun
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 64
Downloads: 38
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Doing some reading on the Skipjack, apparently most said the closest analog to how it handled was flying an aircraft. Just something to think about.
-Jenrick |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Sailor man
![]() Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 45
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I spoke to former serving Sub officer back at a wedding a while back, he turned up in proper uniform including the sword etc.
Anyways, I spent the entire afternoon talking to him. They spent a lot of their time in Soviet waters, basically spying. Certainly through his duration in the navy he said they were not particularly concerned about their torpedoes because they knew about their performance from observing soviet exercise. The one thing they were gravely concerned about was the Soviet use of these RBU rockets. The Soviets would regularly fire these at anything they caught a sniff off, even in peacetime and it was never pleasant. Soviet surface vessels knew NATO subs would often spy on them and so it was common for them to park a surface ship up drifting on the edge of any exercise, knowing it would be virtually invisible and then use it to fire rockets at anything that came close enough. If you got hit, of course the Soviets would have said a foreign vessel in their waters was there on a hostile spying mission and had 'strayed into a live fire exercise by accident' etc etc etc. One of the other very risky things they used to do was trail other NATO boats very closely and then report to high command that they had managed it. The message would then be passed to the other country. The main risk from this was basically running into the opposing friendly sub. I don't doubt for a second this still goes on. I think a British Sub scraped a Frenchie not long ago playing games. Of course, around the North Sea and English channel the water isn't all that deep so detecting each other a bit more straight-forward than in the open ocean. Last edited by ollie1983; 07-09-17 at 05:56 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 72
Downloads: 26
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Chief
![]() Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: U-32's Wintergarten
Posts: 325
Downloads: 182
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 72
Downloads: 26
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Sparky
![]() Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 158
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Another 20 yr retired submariner here..
That's a good question, and while I was not a Sonar Tech, Fire Control or an Officer, yea there are many things a sub can/does do! I was a Chief of the Watch (which is in control of almost the entire Sub unerway) and let me tell you that was the coolest thing I ever did.. Was working on becoming a Diving Officer but well..I retired lol Now obviously I cannot say yes a fictional #1 is true or #3 is false because even being retired, there are things I cannot say ![]() Sub crews do spend a lot of time practicing evasion tactics, and more specifically I mean the ships control party (OOD, helmsman/planesman, COW, DOOW) Sonar and Quartermaster as well. Playing DW right now and man this stuff brings back memories! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|