![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
CINC Pacific Fleet
![]() |
![]()
Via IFL
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
|
![]()
I guess I fail to see why it's surprising that science doesn't have all the answers to all the questions. We inhabit a tiny mote of dust in an infinite universe and have only started using the scientific method comparatively recently in human history.
I'm surrounded by things that science hasn't explained yet. But, despite the large number of things that are still unexplained, I can't think of anything better to use than science to explain them. Well, I suppose just making stuff up would be an easy way, like we did through most of human history, but it's not an especially useful method.
__________________
![]() ![]() --Mobilis in Mobili-- |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
If science could explain everything, there would be no need for science.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
GLOBAL MODDING TERRORIST
|
![]()
Any solutions to these problems ?
Time. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Usually the ivention of a proper energy source pushes solutions forward.
Current technology only improves itself, anything new will have to wait for something better to power it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
CINC Pacific Fleet
![]() |
![]()
When I saw one of these unsolved problems Cold fusion
I made a search for it, to read more about and I found this http://ecat.com/ Want to know more about ecat Through wiki I was told.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer What shall I, how aren't any expert in that field, believe ?? Markus |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|