![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Watch
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 21
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Hi commanders,
With the below image, i show you one of a few tables for prediction range during first phase of tma. ![]() This posted image is usable only if relative bearing of target is 75<=B<=85, and ownship and target are along lag los. For obtain prediction range must be calculated bearing rate after 2 min from first relative bearing B. Example: if bearing rate is 1.7, you have the 68.23% probability that target is on interval [5.5 , 6.5] nm. But the probability that target is on interval [6 , 8] nm is 95.4% (Gaussian). This is a great information (statistic) and no a magic solution. For calculate bearing rate with good accuracy i have find simple method in a manual of tma from betasom forum, in italian language. I haven't had problem understand with google translate. Last point important, this tables must be used with ownship speed between 6,7 knots, and when target speed is between 5,7 knots. In all other situations the error of prediction will increase. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: AN9771
Posts: 4,904
Downloads: 304
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Can you explain the rational behind those standard deviation numbers? What sort of probability is that? Also how do you get from probability percentages to standard deviations and back in the first place. (I like math, but I suck at statistics, so it's still magic to me)
While my Italian is even worse than my 'statistic', it would have been nice if you could have provided a link to that forum. Maybe it is public enough to get a peek inside on that method. And let Google Translator have a go at it. Could be fun. ![]() Still, only with relative target bearing between 75 and 85, and speeds between 6 and 7 , or target needing to be between 5 and 7, seems to be quite limiting in use to me. Such narrow bounds. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
Watch
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 21
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() You know that the bearing rate has a very good correlation with the distance of the contact. It's inversely proportional to the range. These tables are born, from a statistical analysis of Bearing rate variation, by varying the range, route target and relative bearing. Quote:
http://www.betasom.it/forum/index.php?showtopic=33792 The direct link is this: http://goo.gl/S7iAUy Page 24. Quote:
About it, I think that speeds between 5 and 7 knots are not very restrictive, for several reasons. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: AN9771
Posts: 4,904
Downloads: 304
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Anyway, I think I'll have pizza tonight and set my teeth in this document. Thanks ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Watch
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 21
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
The standard deviations in that tables shows how much is variation or dispersion of the bearing rate from the average value, for the particular situation fixed by relative bearing, type of los and range. Quote:
If a player is moving at speeds less than 5 knots, means that its towed array will be curved in depth, this will not give him a good solution, and the transducers can be below the layer. I think that an experienced player will never move at speeds less to 4 knots in research or attack phase. Still, if the target has a velocity greater than 8 knots, is very likely that you will hear him with two sensors or you can get information from the demon. In these cases it's easy to proceed with the usual methods, Triangulation, Strip plotting ecc.. I have answered to your doubt? Thank you for your interest ![]() Last edited by NavyUSA; 03-25-14 at 01:26 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Watch
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 21
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Pisces, what methods you use to calculate the Br?
I to calculate a history of Br use the method described by Cristian, but if I want to calculate a single value of Br I determine the angle between two lines of bearing directly from the screen of the Tma station (trigonometric). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|