SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-22-13, 07:21 AM   #1
Feuer Frei!
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Valhalla
Posts: 5,295
Downloads: 141
Uploads: 17
Default .44 Magnum Fail!

Rare occurrence i would assume.
Of course, there may well be a law suit that occurred with this particular incident, hence the publication.


Quote:
Smith & Wesson Model 629 .44 Magnum with 6½ inch barrel that has been the victim of a rare phenomenon known as an integral detonation. An explosion that blows the gun apart, this would have occurred when the gun was initially fired


http://www.vincelewis.net/44magboom.html


A round contains a double charge?


__________________
"History is the lies that the victors agree on"- Napoleon

LINK TO MY SH 3 MODS

Last edited by Feuer Frei!; 12-22-13 at 08:45 AM.
Feuer Frei! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-13, 07:50 AM   #2
Ducimus
Rear Admiral
 
Ducimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,987
Downloads: 67
Uploads: 2


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feuer Frei! View Post

A round contains a double charge?
I suppose that's possible. Always, always, always do quality control over your reloads.

Personally, I
- always use projectiles by the same manufacturer to minimize variances in weight.
- always sort my brass by manufacturer for the same reason.
- weigh each and every round as i move it from the press bin, to a storage box. ( I hate squib loads)
- look for split cases (again) as I move finished round to above mentioned storage box. ( I hate case head separation )

Depending on brass used, your mean weight will change. For example, off the top of my head, finished 9mm cartridges with blazer brass was 184 grains or so. Winchester was 180, federal is also 180 grains. If you know your charging 4 to 4.3 grains of powder, then any deviation 4 grains below the mean average should be rejected. I like to remove rounds that are 2 grains deviation. When you've had 3 squib loads in the past, you get anal about this. Its worth nothing that some deviation in weight IS expected because not all brass, even by same manufacture is of the same eight. Some batch's are different. Also, an auto-powder measure is only accurate up to 0.3 grains or so.

Now, one thing I never checked for however, was overcharging. I'm not even sure this is possible on a progressive press. I just loaded about 370 9mm rounds yesterday. Maybe ill go back and weigh all of them again, because I know there's a couple that go 4 grains over the mean weight, but I just dismissed that as being deviation in brass weight.
Ducimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-13, 08:55 AM   #3
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

That's-a some-a big-a boom!
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-13, 09:57 AM   #4
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,404
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

I used to work with a guy who hot loaded his own .44 rounds. As if the normal .44 round is not powerful enough.

To him, more power was everything. Unfortunately, not only did he know little about ballistics, he knew little about safe loading.

He had this very nice and expensive Dan Wesson (I think you can see where this is going)

The bad news is that he blew the barrel of his gun.
The good news is that the splinter from that barrel missed his eye by about 1/8 inch and merely dug a divit in the side of his cheek.

Another data point for "just because you can afford a piece of equipment, does not mean you should."

.44 mag hot loads.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-13, 10:07 AM   #5
Ducimus
Rear Admiral
 
Ducimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,987
Downloads: 67
Uploads: 2


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Platapus View Post

To him, more power was everything. Unfortunately, not only did he know little about ballistics, he knew little about safe loading.
That is just downright dangerous. Handloading is a detail oriented hobby. Part science, and part art.
Ducimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-13, 10:14 AM   #6
Wolferz
Navy Seal
 
Wolferz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On a mighty quest for the Stick of Truth
Posts: 5,963
Downloads: 52
Uploads: 0
That weapon must belong to Tim the tool man Taylor.
MORE POWER < gorilla grunts>

Forget the "pop no kick"
That was a "boom no face"
__________________

Tomorrow never comes
Wolferz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-13, 11:23 AM   #7
Onkel Neal
Born to Run Silent
 
Onkel Neal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Cougar Trap, Texas
Posts: 21,385
Downloads: 541
Uploads: 224


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Platapus View Post
I used to work with a guy who hot loaded his own .44 rounds. As if the normal .44 round is not powerful enough.

To him, more power was everything. Unfortunately, not only did he know little about ballistics, he knew little about safe loading.

He had this very nice and expensive Dan Wesson (I think you can see where this is going)

The bad news is that he blew the barrel of his gun.
The good news is that the splinter from that barrel missed his eye by about 1/8 inch and merely dug a divit in the side of his cheek.

Another data point for "just because you can afford a piece of equipment, does not mean you should."

.44 mag hot loads.
That was me in the 80s. Gun magazines said the Ruger Super Blackhawk was capable of extremely hot loads, and I made it my duty to test that out. Can't remember just how many grains or percent I hotloaded, but everyone who saw the gun shoot couldn't get over the ten-foot flames coming out the barrel.

Would not do that now.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg snakekiller.jpg (93.7 KB, 11 views)
__________________
SUBSIM - 26 Years on the Web
Onkel Neal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.