Did you know a 3rd WTC Tower Fell on 9/11/2001 ?

[tonschk]

Did you know a 3rd WTC Tower Fell on 9/11/2001 ?, This reinforced steel frame World Trade Center building was NOT hit by a plane, and were just some random fires inside, and in the afternoon mysteriously fell very fast in just about six (6) SECONDS, very very identical to a usual controlled demolition implosion, yet the united states government LIE to us telling this building fell in just six (6) seconds because of some random fires inside



http://www.ae911truth.org/

[Schroeder]

Here we go again....

[Herr-Berbunch]

Wow, your late to this part of the conspiracy - where have you been for the last decade. Without even looking at the link I guess it says thermite must have been used, blah blah, people were told not to go to work in that building.

[tonschk]

Growing amount of architects and engineers expose the crimes of the united states government

http://www.ae911truth.org/

[kranz]

Originally Posted by Herr-Berbunch

people were told not to go to work in that building.

sorry but you got it wrong, Tony.
non-Jews were told to go and Jews were told not to go.

posts <Jet fuel?That's_a_good_one.jpg>

[Feuer Frei!]

In before Tribesman.

[Oberon]

*inbeforethe'truthers'*

[Subnuts]

The Truth is a lie.

[WernherVonTrapp]

Originally Posted by tonschk

Did you know a 3rd WTC Tower Fell on 9/11/2001 ?

Actually, there were 7 WTC buildings. All were destroyed, not just a 3rd building.

[Dowly]

Originally Posted by tonschk

Did you know a 3rd WTC Tower Fell on 9/11/2001 ?

Yes.

This reinforced steel frame World Trade Center building was NOT hit by a plane,

No, it wasnt.

and were just some random fires inside,

Quite a bit of smoke for "some random fires".

and in the afternoon mysteriously fell very fast in just about six (6) SECONDS,

It took 5.4 seconds for the 18 upper floors to collapse out of view (according to NIST). The total time would be longer than that.
Also note that most of what we see collapsing is just an empty shell,
the innards started to collapse with the east penthouse, several seconds
before the facade went down. Video evidence clearly shows that.

"NIST stated that the north face of the building descended 18 stories (the
portion of the collapse visible in the video) in 5.4 seconds, based on video
analysis of the building collapse. This time period is 40 percent longer than
the 3.9 seconds this process would have taken if the north face of the
building had descended solely under free fall conditions."

Source: http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/f..._qa_082108.cfm

Video of the east penthouse collapsing inside the building:


Note the sky visible in the corner after the penthouse collapses. Also,
windows breaking is clearly visible as the penthouse goes in.

very very identical to a usual controlled demolition implosion,

Except for the.. you know.. explosions.

1) 9/11 Commission Report didnt mention WTC7.
- The aim of the report was to find out why and how
the terrorist attacks happened. WTC7 wasnt a target, but collateral damage. That's why WTC7 and the other buildings that were destroyed on 9/11
werent mentioned.

2) Silverstein's "pull it".
- This of course refers to Chief Daniel Nigro's decision to pull the firefighters
out of the area. It would seem Silverstein wants to make it look like he was
part of the decision making, but it was Chief Nigro who made the decision
without consulting or informing anyone.

"For these reasons I made the decision (without consulting the owner, the
mayor or anyone else - as ranking fire officer, that decision was my
responsibility) to clear a collapse zone surrounding the building and to stop
all activity within that zone. Approximately three hours after that order was
given, WTC 7 collapsed."

Source: https://sites.google.com/site/911guide/danielnigro

http://www.ae911truth.org/

Richard Gage (the head of ae911truth) hasnt been able to show any evidence to back his claims. He shifts the burden of proof to those
who believe the official story, and if something cannot be explained so that
he is satisfied it's automatically inside job.

Richard Gage vs. Chris Mohr debate (2½ hours):


AE911Truth Blueprint For Truth Respectful Rebuttal by Chris Mohr (3h46m):

[tonschk]

[Sailor Steve]

So you pop back in again just to post a picture which says nothing new and proves nothing.

Once again - do you actually have anything to say? Are you capable of saying anything, or do you just quote what others say? Have you ever had an original thought?

People who actually know how to express themselves are wondering.

[HundertzehnGustav]

or are reading books like: "do not feed the trolls"?

[Feuer Frei!]

Originally Posted by HundertzehnGustav

or are reading books like: "do not feed the trolls"?

More like people are reading: DO feed the trolls.

42 posts in this thread
How many of them have addressed what OP has in mind, i haven't counted.