Security Suites

[Skybird]

It's time again to decide whether I buy a new licence for my Avira Premium 2013 Suite, or go with another product. Avira has had a good reputation years ago, but since two or three years has dropped to the lower end of the midfield. I am also engaged in a so far minor fight with them over a proclaimed automatic deal that I should have agreed to somewhere some day, but of which I am certain I never did it because I hate such automatic addon-deals. In short, security-wise it is sub-standard and it has given me too many false alarm recently.

Which alternative to pick? I am eyeing these to, Bit Defender, and F-Secure, because they are leading the list of this "independent" - real or fake, I don'T know - security solution analysing website: http://www.av-test.org/tests/privata...7/sepokt-2012/

However, in customer feedbacks on some shopping sites I read little about F-Secure, and much negative feedback on Bit Defender claimed to cripple the system and putting a very big foot on the break, slowing the system down, making Windows Updates impossible and pretty much ruining the installation in case of attempted deinstallation. Well, I have my Symantec debacle of around ten years ago still on mind. Creeping slow system, ruined Windows root installation, a disaster at that time, since then it is : never again Symantec.

Security-wise, however, both are found in tests to lead the pack this year, and quite clearly so.

Comments? Advise? Bit Defender is tempting because it is a three-PC licence, and I have to maintain the rig of my parents, too. Another piece on soldi info on another program that offers solid security and is easy on the system? Trend Micro, or G-Data maybe? Kaspersky? I think now I listed the top five, or not?

[Skybird]

Forget F-Secure. Apparently the "firewall" it has bases on the Windows Firewall and the rules for it get designed by the company without the user being able to alter them in any way, I read.

????

Not convincing, that.

[Uboatman]

Originally Posted by Skybird

Forget F-Secure. Apparently the "firewall" it has bases on the Windows Firewall and the rules for it get designed by the company without the user being able to alter them in any way, I read.

????

Not convincing, that.

I have F-secure on one of my machines and it has never been a problem for anything I've needed to do, any settings options you'd like me to check? I will say that Customer Support from F-secure that I've needed to use on a number of occasions has been excellent, and I would recommend them to anyone based on the current package I have.

[Skybird]

I'm just quoting some customer feedback. Some said that the F-Secure Suite bases on only the Windows firewall, and does not allow alteration of settings and defining rules for given applications different than those centrally decided on and implemented by the company. But I want to be able to define rules myself for certain software, so that it is being blocked always, or always must ask for permission to access the web, for example.

The first one for example is useful for unwanted updaters that you cannot avoid getting installed when installing an apllication (Logitech for example), and they notoriously give away system data or ripplefire registraiton request at you. The second is nice for software of which purpose I am not certain and thus I do not want it to access the internet in the background without giving me a note first that it wants to do that.

Anyhow, I tend to try Kaspersky. But then: again customer feedback. Many people seem to have reported registration issues, and their service not answering at all. The copies for the German market seem to have an issue with localization and thus some or many of them do not accept the registration code, saying it is for another localisation only.

Some suites seem to offer security features that rely on Chrome, Mozilla or Explorer being used, by their specs they give the impression they make use of these mandatory. But I use Opera, and I will not go back to Explorer. I learned to love Opera.

[the_tyrant]

I use eeye blink

http://www.beyondtrust.com/Products/...intProtection/


Very customizable, very versatile, includes an IDS (intrusion detection system), the antivirus detection is a bit too intense though.

For example, QQ, a very popular Chinese IM system is detected as "adware". Sure, it has very annoying Ads, and there are lots of popup ads, but it shouldn't really be labled as malicious and quarantined.

But than again, in most cases, update your software, and have good usage habits. It helps more than any type of security software out there.

[HundertzehnGustav]

Eyeball V.1.1 and Handsoff Version 13
The usual suspects a la Malwarebytes, S&D,CC, and my newest find (not so new, but to me) - Combofix.

[Skybird]

Originally Posted by the_tyrant

But than again, in most cases, update your software, and have good usage habits. It helps more than any type of security software out there.

Hm, you need both, the one cannot replace the other. Be paranoid a bit, have what you call "good usage habits" - and have a competent security guard solution set up as well. Even good usage habits cannot safe you from randomly hitting a formerly trustworthy site that meanwhile got infested.

I want one that does not cause a mess on my system, works with reliable results, and does not put too much stress on my system when I do heavy simming. Malwarebyte's I already use. Very good one - it saved me where Avira failed, repeatedly.