SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-16-10, 02:04 AM   #1
Flaxpants
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Koh Samui, Thailand
Posts: 1,196
Downloads: 168
Uploads: 0
Default Sub fuel ranges

Just wondering how some of you more experienced players manage your fuel loads. As far as I am aware I can only get two indications of my fuel/range- The fuel gauge, and the navigator report on maximum range at current speed. The navigators report seems to vary wildly- last night whilst on patrol (and travelling at a constant engine speed), the reports seemed to go from 5000k up to at one point 11,000k, but I appreciate that variables like the wind, surface conditions etc probably have a great effect on this value.
Is there any method you use which enables you to calculate your remaining fuel and range more exactly?
Flaxpants is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-10, 02:30 AM   #2
Gerald
SUBSIM Newsman
 
Gerald's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Close to sea
Posts: 24,254
Downloads: 553
Uploads: 0


Hello!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaxpants View Post
Just wondering how some of you more experienced players manage your fuel loads. As far as I am aware I can only get two indications of my fuel/range- The fuel gauge, and the navigator report on maximum range at current speed. The navigators report seems to vary wildly- last night whilst on patrol (and travelling at a constant engine speed), the reports seemed to go from 5000k up to at one point 11,000k, but I appreciate that variables like the wind, surface conditions etc probably have a great effect on this value.
Is there any method you use which enables you to calculate your remaining fuel and range more exactly?
What sub,are you use?
__________________
Nothing in life is to be feard,it is only to be understood.

Marie Curie





Gerald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-10, 02:35 AM   #3
Flaxpants
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Koh Samui, Thailand
Posts: 1,196
Downloads: 168
Uploads: 0
Default

Using the type VIIC, 1941.
Flaxpants is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-10, 04:03 AM   #4
sergei
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,788
Downloads: 405
Uploads: 29
Default

Make sure you are not recharging batteries when you ask for range. That really FUBARS the result, because you're running with one engine at flank for the recharge.

I've seen my estimate vary by up to 2000km in a storm, never as much as 6000km

After a few patrols you just get a good feel for the sort of ranges you can achieve.
sergei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-10, 04:34 AM   #5
GoDeep
Planesman
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 188
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
Default

If you have GWX 3 installed, you should also have the manual that came with it. There is a table there that lists the U-boat ranges from "vanilla" SH3 and SH3 with GWX. It's on page 72 of the manual.

According to the table, the type VII's had a range of 12.000 miles in stock SH3, but 15.000 miles in GWX. (For why that is, see the manual, they explain it very well). The various type IX's had varying ranges, ranging from 16.000 miles for the IXB, to a staggering 44.000 miles for the IXD2!
(20.000 and 55.000 respectively in GWX)

The slower you go, the further you can travel (less rpms for the diesels). The type VII traditionally cruised at about 7 knots, which seemed to be the most fuel efficient speed. The faster you go, the more fuel you burn, of course.
GoDeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-10, 11:41 AM   #6
Pisces
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: AN9771
Posts: 4,904
Downloads: 304
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoDeep View Post
...
The slower you go, the further you can travel (less rpms for the diesels). The type VII traditionally cruised at about 7 knots, which seemed to be the most fuel efficient speed. The faster you go, the more fuel you burn, of course.
Not completely accurate. There is a maximum efficiancy at a certain speed. If you go faster then you burn more fuel, but if you go slower then you also burn more fuel per kilometre.

To the thread starter: Just set your uboat to different knot settings, let the needle settle on it, then ask the navigator for range possible at current speed. As said, keep in mind the recharge setting and weather conditions. Wind direction and such doesn't really affect fuel efficiency, but you do go less far in heavy weather.
__________________
My site downloads: https://ricojansen.nl/downloads
Pisces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-10, 04:32 PM   #7
Snestorm
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoDeep View Post
If you have GWX 3 installed, you should also have the manual that came with it. There is a table there that lists the U-boat ranges from "vanilla" SH3 and SH3 with GWX. It's on page 72 of the manual.

According to the table, the type VII's had a range of 12.000 miles in stock SH3, but 15.000 miles in GWX. (For why that is, see the manual, they explain it very well). The various type IX's had varying ranges, ranging from 16.000 miles for the IXB, to a staggering 44.000 miles for the IXD2!
(20.000 and 55.000 respectively in GWX)

The slower you go, the further you can travel (less rpms for the diesels). The type VII traditionally cruised at about 7 knots, which seemed to be the most fuel efficient speed. The faster you go, the more fuel you burn, of course.
Result:
GWX is more accurate for East/West trips.
Stock is more accurate for North/South trips.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.