SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-22-10, 02:20 PM   #1
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default Ban on offshore drilling lifted...

By a federal judge...

I can hear the steam escaping from Obama's considerable ears from here.

Quote:
A New Orleans federal judge lifted the six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling imposed by President Barack Obama following the largest oil spill in U.S. history. Shares of drilling services companies jumped on the news.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-0...ral-judge.html

This should be interesting... wonder if he will call the judge into the whitehouse along with McChrystil.

Obama is having a rough week and its only tuesday
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-10, 02:23 PM   #2
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,221
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamWake View Post
wonder if he will call the judge into the whitehouse along with McChrystil.
Different chain of command. The judge would be well within his rights to tell Obama to take a flying leap. The Executive branch controls the military, but it specifically does not control the Judiciary.
__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-10, 02:34 PM   #3
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by August View Post
Different chain of command. The judge would be well within his rights to tell Obama to take a flying leap. The Executive branch controls the military, but it specifically does not control the Judiciary.
What according to the constitution remember whom you are dealing with here.
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-10, 02:46 PM   #4
nikimcbee
Fleet Admiral
 
nikimcbee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Patroling the Slot.
Posts: 17,952
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Oh noz, what about hope n change?
__________________
nikimcbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-10, 02:54 PM   #5
thorn69
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by August View Post
Different chain of command. The judge would be well within his rights to tell Obama to take a flying leap. The Executive branch controls the military, but it specifically does not control the Judiciary.
Obama is filling the Supreme court up with liberal women who Obama can easily manipulate into overriding any lower level judge. Obama got them the job (unethically since he used "gender" and "race" as a requirement for the job) and now all they have to do is get down on their knees and kiss his butt for it. Remember, chicks love black guys with big... ears!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-10, 06:43 PM   #6
AngusJS
Seasoned Skipper
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 746
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thorn69 View Post
Obama is filling the Supreme court up with liberal women who Obama can easily manipulate into overriding any lower level judge. Obama got them the job (unethically since he used "gender" and "race" as a requirement for the job) and now all they have to do is get down on their knees and kiss his butt for it. Remember, chicks love black guys with big... ears!
Wow, you concluded all that based on a sample size of...one? That's impressive.
AngusJS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-10, 08:17 PM   #7
thorn69
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AngusJS View Post
Wow, you concluded all that based on a sample size of...one? That's impressive.
He's selected two so far and both have been women - fat women to be more precise. One of them is a minority Latino woman who made a racist as well as sexist comment about white males awhile back. The other one hasn't taken her (very large) seat yet. There are rumors that she may have been in, or is currently in, a lesbian relationship and there are some questions if she will be fair and impartial towards heterosexuals who frown on homosexuality. Meanwhile they're probably making sure they get her a big enough chair to put her fat behind in. She's quite a heffer from my understanding. Cows must envy her!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-10, 08:22 PM   #8
AngusJS
Seasoned Skipper
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 746
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thorn69 View Post
He's selected two so far and both have been women - fat women to be more precise. One of them is a minority Latino woman who made a racist as well as sexist comment about white males awhile back. The other one hasn't taken her (very large) seat yet. There are rumors that she may have been in, or is currently in, a lesbian relationship and there are some questions if she will be fair and impartial towards heterosexuals who frown on homosexuality. Meanwhile they're probably making sure they get her a big enough chair to put her fat behind in. She's quite a heffer from my understanding. Cows must envy her!
That's right, forgot about Sotomayor.

Who cares about Kagan's relationships?

Who cares if they're fat?

IIRC Thomas and Scalia aren't exactly Mr. Universe contenders.
AngusJS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-10, 03:00 PM   #9
Zachstar
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 1,956
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamWake View Post
By a federal judge...

I can hear the steam escaping from Obama's considerable ears from here.



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-0...ral-judge.html

This should be interesting... wonder if he will call the judge into the whitehouse along with McChrystil.

Obama is having a rough week and its only tuesday
Actually now that it is being revealed that the Judge likely has a conflict of interest in my opinion I think the announced appeal will solidify the ban.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/201006...s/ynews_ts2771
__________________

Zachstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-10, 03:03 PM   #10
Stealth Hunter
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Y'ha-Nthlei
Posts: 4,262
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Article
The report discloses that in 2008, Judge Feldman held less than $15,000 worth of stock in Transocean, as well as similar amounts—federal rules only require that judges report a range of values—in Hercules Offshore, ATP Oil and Gas, and Parker Drilling. All of those companies offer contract offshore drilling services and operate offshore rigs in the Gulf of Mexico. Judge Feldman also owned between $15,000 and $50,000 in notes offered by Ocean Energy, Inc., a company that offers "concept design and manufacturing design of submersible drilling rigs," according to its web site. None of the companies were direct parties to the lawsuit seeking to overturn the ban.


Judge Feldman did not immediately return a message seeking comment.

Ah, makes sense he'd reverse the ban. And that he hasn't commented on this development lol.
Stealth Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-10, 03:08 PM   #11
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Wow dident take long to dig up some dirt... but 'shrug' he is after all a federal judge no real supprises there.

Just as there is no supprises as to the reactions.
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-10, 03:12 PM   #12
Zachstar
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 1,956
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamWake View Post
Wow dident take long to dig up some dirt... but 'shrug' he is after all a federal judge no real supprises there.

Just as there is no supprises as to the reactions.
So knowing a potential conflict of interest is "digging up dirt" now.. Gotcha

This development is very good tho. The likely CoI will sink the case in appeal. About time too after a string of horrific right wing activist judge decisions as of late.

I am for continuing drilling in the gulf but not until the leak is stopped and there is time to make absolutely sure it wont happen again. Its been proven now that the "safe and secure" argument is a bunch of lies.
__________________

Zachstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-10, 03:37 PM   #13
thorn69
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zachstar View Post
So knowing a potential conflict of interest is "digging up dirt" now.. Gotcha

This development is very good tho. The likely CoI will sink the case in appeal. About time too after a string of horrific right wing activist judge decisions as of late.

I am for continuing drilling in the gulf but not until the leak is stopped and there is time to make absolutely sure it wont happen again. Its been proven now that the "safe and secure" argument is a bunch of lies.
Obama wanted to build more oil rigs in the gulf and off the state of Florida and Virginia just before this crisis happened! Obama didn't seem too worried about it then and only now is he concerned about the safety and security of building any more. You're desperately looking for an excuse to blame GWB for this. Go ahead and admit that and make yourself look even more foolish.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-10, 03:53 PM   #14
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zachstar View Post
So knowing a potential conflict of interest is "digging up dirt" now.. Gotcha.
At worst the Judge showed a poor lack of judgement I am un aware of any laws against judges holding shares of publicly traded companys.

However he should have been aware of the possible implications of a conflict of interest.... unless...
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.