Truth gets sentenced to 3x life

Skybird · 01-26-10, 04:08 PM

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-70-years.html

Why am I not surprised. If I am not mistaken, in 2003, in one of the debates we had, I even have predicted such a move in late 2003. I was called "unreasonable", since there "was nothing to be hidden".

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8397625.stm

With the medical records being locked away for 70 years, Lord hutto0n also ruled that he written records he based his infamous inquiry report on also should be kept hidden for 30 years.

This way it is made sure that nobody responsible can be held responisble and for the rest of his life is allowed to continue his career and money-making projects - isn't this life great for big fish?

Jimbuna · 01-26-10, 05:10 PM

I must admit...this does raise my suspicions

Schroeder · 01-26-10, 05:46 PM

I find that awesome

...Not.

01-26-10, 05:49 PM

They just keep handing each other immunity.

The terms "national security" and "personal security" become more and more interchangable.

Skybird · 01-26-10, 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snestorm

They just keep handing each other immunity.

The terms "national security" and "personal security" become more and more interchangable.

L'état c'est mois.

01-26-10, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skybird

L'état c'est mois.

Oui.

Castout · 01-27-10, 12:39 AM

Dirty job done requires dirty cover up too....but the screen pretty much explains what was covered. The need to keep the record classified is an obvious explanation itself. They just don't want to be prosecuted.

I wonder how necessary it was to eliminate Dr Kelly...?[I know I'm outspoken]

01-26-10, 04:08 PM	#1
Skybird Soaring Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: the mental asylum named Germany Posts: 42,660 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	Truth gets sentenced to 3x life http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-70-years.html Why am I not surprised. If I am not mistaken, in 2003, in one of the debates we had, I even have predicted such a move in late 2003. I was called "unreasonable", since there "was nothing to be hidden". http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8397625.stm With the medical records being locked away for 70 years, Lord hutto0n also ruled that he written records he based his infamous inquiry report on also should be kept hidden for 30 years. This way it is made sure that nobody responsible can be held responisble and for the rest of his life is allowed to continue his career and money-making projects - isn't this life great for big fish? __________________ If you feel nuts, consult an expert.

01-26-10, 05:10 PM	#2
Jimbuna Chief of the Boat Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: 250 metres below the surface Posts: 190,645 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 13	I must admit...this does raise my suspicions __________________ Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something. Oh my God, not again!!

01-26-10, 05:46 PM	#3
Schroeder Navy Seal Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Banana Republic of Germany Posts: 6,170 Downloads: 62 Uploads: 0	I find that awesome...Not. __________________ Putting Germ back into Germany.

01-27-10, 12:39 AM	#7
Castout Silent Hunter Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Jakarta Posts: 4,794 Downloads: 89 Uploads: 6	Dirty job done requires dirty cover up too....but the screen pretty much explains what was covered. The need to keep the record classified is an obvious explanation itself. They just don't want to be prosecuted. I wonder how necessary it was to eliminate Dr Kelly...?[I know I'm outspoken] __________________ My blog: http://exposingsingapore.wordpress.com/

01-26-10, 05:49 PM	#4
Snestorm Stowaway Posts: n/a Downloads: Uploads:	They just keep handing each other immunity. The terms "national security" and "personal security" become more and more interchangable.