![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phx. Az
Posts: 1,458
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
True story. Taken from U-47.org
Prien's Ghost? The story of the attack by U-47 at Scapa flow did not end on the fateful day in October 1939; as recently as September 2002, almost 63 years after the event, Prien and his boat were in the news again following the rather bizarre discovery of one its torpedoes by the Norwegian tanker MV Petrotrym. The following extract is taken from The Scottish Banner, a paper published in the United States for Scottish expatriates: "TORPEDO" - Scapa Flow, Orkneys: An oil tanker recently had a narrow escape when it was nearly hit by a German torpedo - fired 63 years ago! The missile was one of four launched by submarine U-47 to scupper the battleship 'Royal Oak' in 1939 resulting in the loss of 833 lives.Following the removal of the torpedo to Scapa Pier on 9 September, Captain Nigel Mills, the Director of Orkney Island Council's Harbours Department, offered the following explanation for its sudden reappearance: "It is difficult to state at this point exactly why this object decided to surface now. We did have an exceptionally low tide on Monday and it is possible that this disturbed the torpedo and allowed it to surface. Compressed air within a chamber inside the torpedo can force them to the surface in the way this one apparently did".While the surfacing of the torpedo can be explained in purely scientific terms, its sudden reappearance in Scapa Flow over sixty years afterwards was remarkable. Might it indeed have been Prien's ghost, shouting defiantly from the depths? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Grey Wolf
![]() |
![]()
Ha, thats brilliant, i wonder if Prien would have been given the tonnage credit for the sinking had this warheadless torpedo somehow sunk that 62000ton tanker
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Pacific Aces Dev Team
|
![]()
... and the warhead still has not appeared
![]() ![]()
__________________
One day I will return to sea ... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Watch
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 24
Downloads: 46
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
A very good read, though. Thanks for posting it. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Watch Officer
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: as far away as possible
Posts: 1,625
Downloads: 147
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
a remarkable story, just like the event that took it there.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] ' We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different.' Kurt Vonnegut |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 94
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
One G7e certainly, Dönitz had give to Prien this type of torpedos for this mission.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
I've always found it interesting that a few modern merchants can equal the tonnage of an entire WWII ace carreer. It's mind boggling how big they've gotten, and at the same time, that there's no shortage of traffic out there.
Thanks for sharing. Great post. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 395
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 1
|
![]()
Possibly but if thats the case then someone does not have their facts straight. G7a/T1 was a wet-heater powered by a combustion engine, the G7e/T2 was battery powered. As far as I know it would not have had any compressed air/gas in it, other than possibly some hydrogen from the batteries. IIRC they both had faulty impact pistols, T2 had some depth keeping problems, and T2 was the only one that had the faulty Magnetic pistol (IIRC even though it does in SH3 T1 did not have a magnetic pistol option)
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|