![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
What for you ask? Why defense spending of course.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090625/...ress_defense_1
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
Hey, that is just great especially when NK said it would nuke our butts if we farted the wrong way.
![]()
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.” ― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
cry babies.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Seasoned Skipper
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 714
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Make no mistake, the F-22 and F-35 engine issues aren't defense spending, they're pork barrel projects disguised as defense spending.
Our GOP-appointed Secretary of Defense has already made it very clear what his position is on this. I'd much rather have Robert Gates running our military than Congress. Gates cares about defending our country, Congressmen only care about getting money spent in their districts. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,894
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I'm a huge fan of the F-22 but...
Frankly, our military is beyond bloated anyways. For the most part, they have still not learned to focus on items other than big ticket Cold War era systems. And when they do, they end up with astronomical costs ANYWAYS due to mission creep, contractors' gimmicks, and Congressional pork (read payola all the way around). It needs to be reigned in. This kind of spending is not sustainable in our debtor economy, especially when our military already eclipses every other by several magnitudes. Quote:
PD |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Ill be the first to admit that some of these programs may have been bloated perhaps even unecessary but to veto the entire bill?
There was no problem finding 10's of billions to bail out failing banks and 'stimulate' the economy. By the way any of you feeling stimulated?
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Seasoned Skipper
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 714
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
As far as the defense spending bill, there's a huge difference between threatening to veto a bill that's being debated and actually vetoing it. It's also not like the military won't get funded if he vetoes it - they'll just send him another package to sign, hopefully without the F-22's and alternate F-35 engines (which is one of the dumbest ideas I've ever heard). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Cold War Boomer
![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Walla Walla
Posts: 2,837
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Obama is not the anti-christ ...
![]() He is the anti-defense ... ![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 1,956
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Lets take a brand new fighter and risk many millions being blown to bits just to give the migs no chance to see a missile coming their way? While I think the ground war will be difficult. The airwar will be a cakewalk. This is not falcon 4. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|