![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
i wanted to run some numbers by you to see what is the most realistic ship slowing times in your opinion
i tested the battleship kongo from a 20 kt speed doing evasive manuvers and at a 15 kt speed and it will stop by just turning off its engines and drifting for the stoping test these are the numbers i got for three different settings i tried: stopping test one: from 15 kts - 11 kts = 2 minutes from 15 kts - 10 kts = 3 minutes 15 seconds from 15 kts - 9 kts = 6 minutes from 15kts - 8 kts = 10 minutes 10 seconds from 15 kts - 7 kts = 15 minutes from 15 kts - 6 kts = 20 minutes 30 seconds from 15 kts - 5 kts = 26 minutes 45 seconds evasive manuvers test: it slows from 20 kts to 10-12 kts when turning ======================================= stopping test two: from 15 kts - 11 kts = 4 minutes 30 seconds from 15 kts - 10 kts = 7 minutes from 15 kts - 9 kts = 10 minutes from 15 kts - 8 kts = 13 minutes 45 seconds from 15 kts - 7 kts = 18 minutes 20 seconds from 15 kts - 6 kts = 24 minutes 15 seconds from 15 kts - 5 kts = 32 minutes it slows from 20 kts to 12-14 kts when turning ======================================= stopping test three: from 15 kts - 11 kts = 4 minutes 30 seconds from 15 kts - 10 kts = 7 minutes from 15 kts - 9 kts = 10 minutes from 15 kts - 8 kts = 13 minutes 45 seconds from 15 kts - 7 kts = 18 minutes 20 seconds from 15 kts - 6 kts = 24 minutes 15 seconds from 15 kts - 5 kts = 32 minutes it slows from 20 kts to 14-15 kts when turning ======================================= acceleration test for all three versions above: from 1 kts - 5 kts = 15 seconds from 1 kts - 10 kts = 1 minute 5 seconds from 1 kts - 15 kts = 2 minutes 50 seconds from 1 kts - 17 kts = 4minutes from 1 kts - 20 kts = 6 minutes 15 seconds in your opinion, which is the most realistic slowing speed in evasive manuvers and in your opinion, which is the most realistic slowing down speed from turning off engines? Last edited by Webster; 03-05-09 at 08:32 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Question: is the same set of adjustments going to affect acceleration and deceleration? I would think (non-researched opinion that could be dead wrong) that deceleration would be considerably faster than acceleration. Tater could really help here I think, with some real ship numbers.
I'm thinking a 20 knot ship should go about 15 knots when maneuvering, decelerate like #1 and take over 30 minutes to go from 1 knot to 20 knots. So I would say acceleration like #3 and deceleration like #1. And of course, the limited controls will probably make it impossible! ![]() That's my opinion right now, subject to correction by hard numbers from real surface craft.
__________________
Sub Skipper's Bag of Tricks, Slightly Subnuclear Mk 14 & Cutie, Slightly Subnuclear Deck Gun, EZPlot 2.0, TMOPlot, TMOKeys, SH4CMS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
drifting is controlled by one set of values and acceleration has its own value. as for stopping its like a train, once you get a large mass in motion its a lot harder to stop it quickly power wise than it was to get it in motion. thats why a train needs brakes on all the cars but only one or two engines to get it going. (an object in motion wants to stay in motion) EDIT: i also added the acceleration tests i got for all 3 versions above Last edited by Webster; 03-05-09 at 08:34 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
On the other hand, a train doesn't have an equal weight of water pushing against it all the time. Ships do decelerate relatively quickly (relative to cars and trains, that is) but the slower the ship is going the less the drag, so it might drop from 15 to 10 knots in a lot less time than it takes to drop from 10 to 5 knots. Funny, that is very much how your tests look.
I think test one is closer to reality, but that's just what I think, not based on any hard facts. On the other hand, there is no way Kongo is going to accelerate to 5 knots in 15 seconds. Should be more like 5 minutes. To 20 knots should take 30 minutes or more. I'll get some numbers from home and put them up tomorrow.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
my biggest problem is turning and the amount of speed that is lost. what do you think about the turning deceleration speeds? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
i figured stopping by reversing engines would be about the same as acceleration speeds so i figured i would assume they are the same but i will check this at a later time. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Soundman
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Millington, MI USA
Posts: 145
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 8
|
![]()
They wouldn't be because reversing engines even at back emergency only uses about 2/3's ships power. So stopping distances should be slightly longer. But not by much because the screws are much more efficient running backwards because of less turbulence in the water.
__________________
http://www.gamefront.com/files/user/jmardlin Last edited by jmardlin; 03-06-09 at 10:52 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Here are the numbers I promised. The first is a graph made for a naval wargames study back in 1929. Kongo should be in the same area as Repulse. ![]() This is an actual acceleration board from a WW2 aircraft carrier. Sorry I can't remember which one, but at the time I wasn't in a position to record where stuff I was downloading came from. ![]()
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|